Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 51.6 kB
Pages: 1
Date: March 29, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 330 Words, 2,336 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23037/23.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 51.6 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
I _ se 3:03-cv-00666-AWT Document 23 Filed 03/27/2004 Pa§é»1r:¤f lcrlele m Inn ‘
W UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURF U
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
illllli MIIB l'l P I2- 08
·········“·······**··············—········ · -·---· ·· ·———--------— >< - ».,~ guizi
_ i ¤‘ , RICT C .
_ LINDA STURM, . CIVIL QR i‘_ ,
Plaintiff, : 3:03CV0666 (AWT)
v.
ROCKY HILL BOARD OF EDUCATION
: MARCH T6, 2004
Defendant. : `
................................................. .. ............ . X
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION NUNC PRO TUNC FOR AN EXTENSION TO
RESPOND TO THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
The plaintiff, Linda Sturm, moves, nunc mg tunc, to extend the deadline to respond to
the defendant’s Motion to Dlsmiss from March 10, 2004 to April 2, 2004. This is the plaintiffs
second request for an extension of the deadline to respond. Defendant’s counsel, Martha
Shaw, represented that the defendant does not oppose the plaintiff’s second motion for an
extension.
The plaintiff had delayed filing the brief after the parties decided to explore whether they
could resolve the case. Despite the parties' efforts, they were unable to settle the case.
Plaintiff's counsel will be in California from March 22~29, 2004 to attend and speak at the Mid-
Winter Meeting of the American Bar Association Labor and Employment Section's EEO
Committee. Although the undersighed’s new associate, Tammy Marzigliano, has started
drafting the PIaintiff’s brief in opposition to the Motion to Dlsmiss, the undersigned counsel will
be urgole to review the brief until after he returns on March 29, 2004. I
A { fl xx Vg____ { Extension GRANTED, n¤ne@Mp,
,.__ E to and Including frpmi ;_ I w,.+" _"'
_ · cw ;s4,_ * It is so ordered.
D: ..... ` . c-, .
fe? gi? " Alvin W- Thnmpson, U.S.D.J.
"` MEIIMIIIGT 3 I 2710*4
*< <* <= < ¤ < A N F F A ==<+= s.iI A ...... .i.. .... I, — is
I i I ·i:r:··+r;· 7 F +‘;, - - as -- e .,_. __._. gji Inin n I I n I I I n I I I n
Tifii rv r iY”1 A ; A ; A ,.... .2 ..... .... as