Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

, p i Case 3:03-cv-OO6 4—_WWE Document 13 Filed 12£1§/200% 5 Féapgjfngb/mj
' I —· I . Q
l Q; -
l UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR'F E- D
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Bq
.. l0=
tum mw M A
RICHARD _ SCHIRILLO, AUGUSTO CIVIL ACTION NO.g3:(%3rCVp, )
CORREIA and RANDOLPH BOND, S {`;iE5'l lil ~· l, if " ·
· U '¤=·»[·~C¥Z>f"ll
Plaintiffs, B`?} ·»‘ I ' ~*
VS- November 3, 2003
TOWN OF STRATFORD, and in their I Q
individual and official capacities EILEEN l
MURPHY, MICHAEL F EENEY, E
DORINDA BORER, MARK BARNHART,
` _ JACK OBERNESSOR, MICHAEL SINGH, l
7 and SANDRA ZALIK Q
_ , [ Defendants.
z tg ’
Q B
Ig G g MOTION TO ADD PLAINTIFF AND AIVIEND COMPLAINT
F!
al I
E Z g Plaintiffs, Richard Schirillo, Augusto Correia, and Randolph Bond, by their
*6 ' Q
¤ D attor?-xy, move the court pursuant to Fed. IL Civ. P. I5 a) and 20 for an order permitting
- ( 3 Plairgjgiffs to add an additional plaintiff to the above- captioned case and amend the -
K` La;.-.2l { l U \
" . ..t... al comlglfaint accordingly. `
mi" "’ I ·
Plaintiffs seek to add Ronald Brenton (hereinafter "Brenton") as a plaintiff and I
rxu ‘· e’ ‘
amend the `cbmplaint to include Brenton as an additional plaintiff and his causes of I
action. Brenton’s claims against Defendants share common questions of fact and law as l
Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants. Brenton, as well as Plaintiffs, were all employees
NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED