Free Motion for Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

r ________ ___n;i_
I Case 2:90-cr-00018-AHN Document 208 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 1 of 2
k
I . ‘
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR%. I tu, I
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
I
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) M5 III III ID I2' Bu
I ) Cr. No. H-90,:1 I, . I,.
I I cw. NO. 3:9Is¢III‘I.IIIs'IIiI»II&II%I‘
)
I GAETANO MILANO )
I
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
I ) Cr. N0. H-90-18
I vs. ) Civ. N0. 3:95CV1171 [AHN] I
) I
I LOUIS PUGLIANO ) I
I
I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) I
I ) Cr. No. H-90-18
“ vs. ) Civ. No. 3:95CV1330 [AHN]
)
I FRANK A. PUGLIANO ) I
I
I
I
PETITIONER LOUIS PUGL|ANO’S MOTION I
FOR RULING ON PETITIONER MILANO'S UNOPPOSED
RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY
RELATING TO THE GOVERNMENT'S PRETRIAL
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT NON-DISCLOSURE

Because the Government has filed no opposition to Petitioner Gaetano MiIano’s
September 21, 2005 Renewed Motion For Leave T0 Conduct Discovery Relating To
The Government’s Pretrial Confidential Informant Non-Disclosure, in which Petitioner
Louis Pugliano has joined, Petitioner Pugliano requests that the Court allow Petitioner
MiIano's unopposed motion and enter an order directing that the Requests For I




." m_I
, Case 2:90-cr-00018-AHN Document 208 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 2 of 2
i Admissions attached to Petitioner l\/liIano’s motion be deemed to have been served on
the Government in keeping with Rule 36 as of the date of the Court’s order, thereby
l
triggering the government’s Rule 36 obligations as of the date of the order. Such an I
order would be a reasonable method of eliminating further undue delay in this step of I
the proceedings and would not be unfair to the Government, which has had the
Requests for Admission since on or about September 22, 2005.
l
LOUIS PUGLIANO, PETITIONER I
l
W »——- l
l\/l. Thompson
mpson & Thompson, P.C.
1331 Main Street, Suite 320
Springfield, MA 01103
[413] 739-2100
Federal Bar # CT15144
Certificate of Service I
l hereby certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing document was I
served upon counsel for all parties by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed to
each at his most recent address listed in the court’s docket, this 10"‘ day of November,
2005. E
g IVI. Thompson