Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 2:91-cv-00180-RNC

Document 512

Filed 12/21/2005

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT P.J., et al. Plaintiffs v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, et al. Defendants : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:91CV00180(RNC)

DECEMBER 20, 2005

OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT

The defendants respectfully object to plaintiffs' submission of the supplemental affidavit of Francis J. Brady in support of plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and costs. For all the reasons set forth in defendants' memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and costs, plaintiffs are not entitled to attorneys' fees and costs. Moreover, even if they were -- which they are not -- any delay in the adjudication or payment of any such fees would not be attributable to the defendants, and they should not be caused to suffer for any such delay.

DEFENDANTS STATE OF CONNECTICUT ET AL. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: ____/s/_____________________________ Ralph E. Urban Assistant Attorney General Federal Bar No. 00349 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Tel: (860) 808-5210 Fax: (860) 808-5385

Case 2:91-cv-00180-RNC

Document 512

Filed 12/21/2005

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on this 20th day of December, 2005, first class postage prepaid to: The Honorable Donna Martinez United States Magistrate Judge 450 Main Street Hartford, CT 06103 David C. Shaw, Esq. 34 Jerome Avenue Suite 210 Bloomfield, CT 06002 Frank J. Laski, Esq. Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee 294 Washington Street, Suite 320 Boston, MA 02108

_____/s/_________________________ Ralph E. Urban Assistant Attorney General

2