Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I e»-km
I ` “ Case 3:00-cv-00720-JCH Document 39 Filed 10/20/2003 Page 1 of 3
I ..
I O Q
I
I rim II in
I I; .`
I iii?} IVZI" $20 A ‘2= It 3
I
I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I -
I FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I
I WILLIAM CONNELLY, : civil. Action No; I
I Plaintiff, : 3:00-CV—720 (JCH)(HBF)
I vs. Q
I :
I DAVID COSGROVE, ET AL. :
Defendants. : OCTOBER 17, 2003
DEFENDANT KENNETH SELIG’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO

THE PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
The co-defendant, Kenneth Selig, IVI.D. ("Dr. SeIIg"), submits this memorandum
of law in opposition to the plaintiffs motion for extension of time dated October 7, 2003. I
For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiff’s motion should be denied.
ARGUMENT _
THE PLAINTIFF HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED GOOD CAUSE
FOR THE GRANTING OF HIS MOTION
The plaintiff has moved for an extension of time to: (1) file a motion to reopen as
to all defendants, (2) prepare and file a brief in support of the motion to reopen, and (3) I
prepare and file an amended complaint. (PI’s Motion, at 1, 5) According to his motion, I
the amended complaint that the plaintiff is preparing will acid the nine defendants the
claims against whom the court previously dismissed with prejudice. (g)
The court’s electronic docket indicates that this case was filed on April 20, 2000. I
By its ruling and order filed on March 13, 2003, the court dismissed the plaintiffs claims
I
tgt:/I)¤»i>dwI2tSqtIur¤ H ]>h(,,,B6(g6()g`
"5 s uint rcc lux () 5 .
Iliri.i‘¤3u, UF 0610:s & I[,,II,,IP I1,,,,S(?v,.,_)26;q5 {
I
i..i
- A L L.--.L.

l..l
=·= 7 A - »- ---ee;e

i I an Case 3:00-cv-00720-JJCH Document 39 Filed 10/2012003 Page 2 of 3
y .-. L2
l
{ against nine defendants with prejudice. Dr. Selig is one of the nine defendants. The
; deadline for a motion for reconsideration of the March 13, 2003 ruling and order has
L long since passed. Moreover, a review of the plaintiffs motion reveals that it does not
L contain any grounds for either granting him an extension of time as to Dr. Selig or
L allowing him to file an amended complaint that includes Dr. Selig. Thus, the plaintiff has
L not demonstrated any basis for receiving an extension of time as to Dr. Selig or for
L asserting any claims against him. Accordingly, the court should deny the p|aintlff’s y
motion.
THE DEFENDANT: {
KENNETH SELIG 1
` C5. l ` L
By *:34 i
David G. Hill ,
CT Fed. Bar No. 1 35 ·
HALLORAN & SA E LLP
One Goodwin Square
225 Asylum Street I
Hartford, CT 06103 j
Tel. No. (860) 522-6103 l
Fax No. (860) 548-0006
His Attorney
l
2
Unc Goodwill Square Phone (860) 522-6103
‘ s 1umS rec wax 860 54-B-0006 ;
or 06103 & SAGE LLP .Luris(No.)26l05


I I I I Case 3:00-cv-0O7%O—)JCH Document 39 Filed 10/29/2003 Page 3 of 3
I CERTIFICATION
I This is to certify that on this 17th day of October, 2003, l hereby caused to be
I mailed, postage prepaid a copy of the foregoing to: I
I Mr. William Connelly I
_ CT # 189009, VA # 290678
I Greenville Correctional Center _
901 Corrections Way
I Jarratt, VA 23870-9614 I
I
Margaret Chapel, Esq. I
I Attorney GeneraI’s Office I
` State of Connecticut I
I MacKenzie Hall I
I 110 Sherman Street _
Hartford, CT 06105
I ` _ I, ·
David . ill I
4w5a¤9.1(Hs.s=i=·; I
475309.1(HSFP) I
I
3 I
Ono Goodwin Square Phone (860) 522-6103 I
` SAS Ium S rcc Fax 860 548-0006 .
iimrogii, ctr 06153 027 SAGE ILILI) Jmas(N¤.)2610s Y
I