Free Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 8.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 384 Words, 2,308 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9482/382.pdf

Download Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Connecticut ( 8.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD

Document 382

Filed 05/11/2004

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:00CV835 (CFD)

V.

MOSTAFA REYAD AND WAFA REYAD Defendants DATE: MAY 10, 2004

DEFENDANTS MOTION TO RECONSIDER RULING ON PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO REDUCE PREJUDGMENT REMEMDY

Defendants Mostafa Reyad and Wafa Reyad respectfully submit this motion and its accompanied memorandum of law requesting Reconsideration of this Court Ruling On Plaintiff s Motion To Reduce Prejudgment Remedy Ordered on April 30, 2004 (Order # 374). Without waiving any of Defendants defenses or claims presently; in the past or the future; this instant motion is defendants defense towards the excessive total of the prejudgment remedy created by the additional of $ 5.7 million issued by The District of New Jersey, for the exact duplicate action.

1

Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD

Document 382

Filed 05/11/2004

Page 2 of 3

Defendants may agree with Plaintiff s opinion that Connecticut District lacks authority on New Jersey District, but Defendants opinion that, this Court has the complete and full authority over the parties in any matter relates to the instant action including New Jersey duplicate action. It has the power of do or not to do on all matters of both litigations, and certainly can punish any contemper. Federal District Courts major junction is Constitutional disputes, thus this Court would not allow violation of the Eighth Amendment presented now by Defendants.

CONCLUSION The Honorable Court should Order Plaintiff to apply to The District of New Jersey requesting lifting the prejudgment attachment for any amount exceeds the amount determined by this Court in its Order dated April 30, 2004 (Order # 374), and to avoid any duplication if any.

2

Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD

Document 382

Filed 05/11/2004

Page 3 of 3

The Defendant Mostafa Reyad

The Defendant Wafa Reyad

By: Mostafa Reyad 2077 Center Ave # 22D Fort Lee, NJ 07024 Day Phone 203-325-4100

By: Wafa Reyad 2077 Center Ave # 22D Fort Lee, NJ 07024 Home Phone 201-585-0562

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that he mailed on the captioned date a true and correct copy to Attorney David Schaefer at 271 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511

Mostafa Reyad

3