Free Memorandum in Support of Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 9.4 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 403 Words, 2,468 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9482/444-1.pdf

Download Memorandum in Support of Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 9.4 kB)


Preview Memorandum in Support of Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD

Document 444

Filed 01/25/2005

Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:00CV835 (CFD)

V.

MOSTAFA REYAD AND WAFA REYAD Defendants DATE: JANUARY 24, 2005

DEFENDANT S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO HOLD UNITED STATES AS AN INDISPENSABLE PARTY

This is Defendant Mostafa Reyad s Supplement to Defendant motion to add the United States as an Indispensable party to Defendant Mostafa Reyad s claims of damages, dated December 27, 2005 (Doc # 442); [Defendant unintentionally typed the date December 28, 2005, and the correct date is December 27, 2005, as it indorsed correctly; December 27, 2005 by the District Clerk]. Defendant stated; under schedule of attachment, attached to his memorandum dated December 27, 2005 (Doc # 443), that he will supplement, the two (2) missing garnishment orders, within 30 days.

Now, to summarize and provide this Honorable Court by the documents evincing the total garnishment issued against Defendant in the amount of $ 18.5 million,

1

Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD

Document 444

Filed 01/25/2005

Page 2 of 4

provided that Plaintiff s instant action was a speculation that the loans will go to foreclosure and Plaintiff admits, that did not happen, and Plaintiff furtherly claims a damage in the amount of $ 243,849.78, and the records show that this false amount was created by Plaintiff as accumulation of interest rate differentiation, and Plaintiff priced the loans at lower price to purchase it.

Definitely Plaintiff s statements and pleadings are false, and even if it is correct, the amount of garnishment as of todate is a little more than seventy five times (75 times) of Plaintiff s false claims, showing unfairness, destruction and devastation to Defendant. It is the worst unfairness in the Federal Judicial System.

2

Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD

Document 444

Filed 01/25/2005

Page 3 of 4

The Defendant Mostafa Reyad

By: Mostafa Reyad 2077 Center Ave # 22D Fort Lee, NJ 07024 Day Phone 203-325-4100

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on the captioned date has mailed the following; each of them a true and correct copy. 1. Connecticut United States Attorney Kevin J. O Conner, Esq. 157 Church Street, New Haven, CT 06510 2. Plaintiff s Attorney David R. Schaefer 271 Whitney Ave, New Haven, CT 06511 3. Wafa Reyad

Mostafa Reyad

3

Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD

Document 444

Filed 01/25/2005

Page 4 of 4

4