Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv-00058-HB

Document 31

Filed 06/06/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : Petitioner, : : v. : : THOMAS L. CARROLL, : Warden, and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, III, : Attorney General for the State of Delaware, : : Respondents. : THOMAS J. CAPANO,

Civ. Act. No. 06-58-***

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, respondents move for an extension of time in which to file an answer to the petition. In support thereof, respondents state the following: 1. The petitioner, Thomas J. Capano, has applied for federal habeas relief, challenging

his 1999 conviction by a Delaware Superior Court jury for first degree murder. D.I. 1. By the terms of the Court's order of April 10, 2007, an answering brief is due to be filed on June 8, 2007. D.I. 30. 2. Counsel for respondents have been, and continue to be, diligently working on

numerous cases before this Court and the state courts. However, the workload for the Appeals Division attorneys is currently very substantial. Counsel have been out of the office for significant amounts of time recently for a variety of reasons, including attending depositions in another case. In light of the situation, a short extension of time is needed to complete the brief. 3. Under Habeas Rule 4, the Court has the discretion to give respondents an extension of

time exceeding the 40-day limit in Civil Rule 81(a)(2). Clutchette v. Rushen, 770 F.2d 1469, 147374 & n.4 (9th Cir. 1985); Kramer v. Jenkins, 108 F.R.D. 429, 431-32 (N.D. Ill. 1985). The comment

Case 1:06-cv-00058-HB

Document 31

Filed 06/06/2007

Page 2 of 5

to Rule 4 expressly states that the district court has "the discretion to take into account various factors such as the respondents' workload" in determining the period of time that should be allowed to answer the petition. 4. 5. This is respondents' second request for an extension of time to file an answering brief. Respondents submit that an extension of time to and including June 22, 2007 in

which to file an answer is reasonable. Respondents submit herewith a proposed order.

/s/ Loren C. Meyers Chief of Appeals Division Del. Bar. ID No. 2210 /s/ Elizabeth R. McFarlan Deputy Attorney General Del. Bar. ID No. 3759 Department of Justice 820 N. French Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8500

DATE: June 6, 2007

Case 1:06-cv-00058-HB

Document 31

Filed 06/06/2007

Page 3 of 5

RULE 7.1.1 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that counsel for the petitioner, Joseph M. Bernstein, Esquire, has been contacted and he has no objection to the subject matter of this motion.

/s/ Elizabeth R. McFarlan Deputy Attorney General Counsel for Respondents

Date: June 6, 2007

Case 1:06-cv-00058-HB

Document 31

Filed 06/06/2007

Page 4 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : Petitioner, : : v. : : THOMAS L. CARROLL, : Warden, and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, III, : Attorney General for the State of Delaware, : : Respondents. : THOMAS J. CAPANO,

Civ. Act. No. 06-58-***

ORDER This _____day of _________________________, 2007, WHEREAS, respondents having requested an extension of time in which to file an answer, and WHEREAS, it appearing to the Court that the requested extension is timely made and good cause has been shown for the extension, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents' answering brief shall be filed on or before June 22, 2007.

____________________________ United States District Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00058-HB

Document 31

Filed 06/06/2007

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 6, 2007, I electronically filed a motion for extension of time with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to Joseph M. Bernstein, Esq.

/s/ Elizabeth R. McFarlan Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice 820 N. French Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8500 Del. Bar. ID No. 3759 [email protected]