Free Motion to Strike - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 238.9 kB
Pages: 5
Date: September 8, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 814 Words, 5,140 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 791 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37443/280.pdf

Download Motion to Strike - District Court of Delaware ( 238.9 kB)


Preview Motion to Strike - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 280

Filed 09/05/2008

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

POLAROID CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, V. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. C.A. No. 06-738-SLR

HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE DECLARATION OF THOMAS L. BEAUDOIN Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") hereby moves to strike portions of the declaration of Thomas L. Beaudoin ("Beaudoin Declaration") (D.I. 195 , Ex. 3), filed in support of "Plaintiff Polaroid Corporation ' s Answering Brief in Opposition to HP ' s Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of Estoppel and, in the Alternative or in Addition , Laches" (Polaroid's "Opposition") (D.I. 194). As stated more fully in HP's Opening Brief, Polaroid ' s Opposition to HP's Laches/Estoppel Summary Judgment Motion relied heavily upon the Beaudoin Declaration. The Beaudoin Declaration, in turn, is based upon statements that Mr. Beaudoin's deposition establishes were not based on Mr. Beaudoin ' s personal knowledge . Therefore , the cited portions of the Beaudoin Declaration should be stricken and not relied upon by the Court in determining the merits of HP ' s Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of Estoppel and, in the Alternative or in Addition, Laches.

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 280

Filed 09/05/2008

Page 2 of 4

Dated : September 5, 2008

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: Raymond N. S tt, Jr. ( 949) 919 N. Market Stre , ui e 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel.: (302) 652-5070 Fax: (302) 652-0607 Email: [email protected] rscottaa,fr. com Robert S. Frank, Jr. (pro hac vice) pro hac vice) Carlos Perez-Albuerne ( pro hac vice) Daniel C . Winston ( CHOATE, HALL & STEWART LLP Two International Place Boston, MA 02109 Tel.: (617) 248-5000 Fax: (617) 248-4000 Emails: [email protected] ; [email protected]; dwinston @choate.com John E. Giust (pro hac vice) Matthew E . Bernstein (pro hac vice) MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO PC 3580 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300 San Diego , CA 92130 Tel.: (858) 314-1500 Fax: (858 ) 314-1501 Emails: ,jgiust@mintz. com; [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim -Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company

2

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 280

Filed 09/05/2008

Page 3 of 4

RULE 7.1.1 CERTIFICATE The undersigned certifies that counsel for movants have made a reasonable effort to reach agreement with the opposing attorneys on the matters set forth in the attached motion.

3

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 280

Filed 09/05/2008

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 5, 2008, I electronically filed with the Clerk of Court the foregoing document using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filing(s) to the following counsel: Via Email Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Julia Heaney (#3052) MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL, LLP 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 Phone: 302-658-9200 Fax: 302-658-3989 Emails: [email protected]; [email protected] Via Email Russell E. Levine, P.C. Michelle W. Skinner/David W. Higer Maria A. Meginnes/Courtney Holohan/C. Beasley KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago , IL 60601 Phone: 312-861-2000 Fax: 312- 861-2200 Emails: rlevine@kirkland. com; ggerst@kirkland. com; mskinner@kirkland. com ; [email protected]; mmeginnes @kirkland. com; mmeginnes @kirkland. com; [email protected] Courtesy Copy Via Federal Express Michelle W. Skinner KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Phone: 312-861-2000 Fax: 312-861-2200 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Polaroid Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Polaroid Corporation

80067298

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 280-2

Filed 09/05/2008

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

POLAROID CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,
V.

C.A. No. 06-738-SLR

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE DECLARATION OF THOMAS L. BEAUDOIN AND NOW, the Court, having considered Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Strike Portions of the Declaration of Thomas L. Beaudoin and all supporting briefs, declarations and exhibits filed by Hewlett -Packard Company and Polaroid Corporation's opposition to the motion and all supporting briefs, declarations and exhibits, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Strike Portions of the Declaration of Thomas L. Beaudoin is GRANTED. Paragraphs 13-20, 22, 23, 26, 29, 30-34, and 39-41 of the Declaration of Thomas L. Beaudoin (D.I. 195, Ex. 3 ) are stricken and Plaintiff Polaroid Corporation' s Answering Brief in Opposition to HP ' s Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of Estoppel and, in the Alternative or in Addition, Laches (D.I. 194 ) will be considered without reference to arguments supported by those portions of Mr. Beaudoin ' s Declaration. SO ORDERED, this day of , 2008.

The Honorable Sue L. Robinson