Free Motion to Preclude - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 266

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

POLAROID CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant. C.A. No. 06-738-SLR

DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S CROSS-MOTION TO PRECLUDE Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") hereby moves for an order excluding the following affidavits and testimony as untimely: (1) (2) the Declaration of Dr. Peggy Agouris Regarding Okada Reference (D.I. 193 at Ex. 3); the Declaration of Dr. Agouris in Support of Polaroid Corporation's Response to HP's Motion to Preclude Certain Testimony of Polaroid's Expert Dr. Peggy Agouris (D.I. 219 at Ex. 2); the Declaration of Mr. Joseph P. Wroblewski filed in support of Polaroid's Response to HP's Motion to Preclude Certain Testimony of Polaroid's Expert Dr. Peggy Agouris (D.I. 219 at Ex. 4); Dr. Agouris' testimony regarding the question of whether Polaroid products embody Claim 7 of the ' patent; 381 the Declaration of Walter McCullough filed in support of Polaroid's Response to HP's Motion to Preclude the Report and Testimony of Polaroid's Survey Expert Walter McCullough (D.I. 218 at Ex. 2); and the Declaration of Thomas L. Beaudoin filed in support of Polaroid's Opposition to HP's Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of Estoppel, Or In The Alternative or In Addition, Laches (D.I. 195 at Ex. 3).

(3)

(4) (5)

(6)

For the reasons outlined in Hewlett-Packard Company's Memorandum In Opposition to Polaroid's Motion to Preclude and In Support Of Hewlett-Packard's Cross-Motion To Preclude and all supporting declarations and exhibits, the above-listed declarations and testimony should

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 266

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 2 of 4

be stricken, the pending summary judgment and Daubert motions should be decided without reference to those declarations, and Polaroid' s witnesses should be precluded from testifying at trial with respect to the corresponding subject matter.

Dated: July 10, 2008

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ William J. Marsden, Jr. William J. Marsden, Jr. (#2247) Raymond N. Scott, Jr. (#4949) 919 N. Market Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 652-5070 Facsimile: (302) 652-0607 Email: [email protected] CHOATE HALL & STEWART, LLP Robert S. Frank, Jr. Daniel C. Winston Carlos Perez-Albuerne Two International Place Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 248-5000 Facsimile: (617) 248-4000 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] MINTZ COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C. John E. Giust Matthew C. Bernstein 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92121-3039 Telephone: 858-320-3000 Facsimile: 858-320-3001 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company

2

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 266

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 3 of 4

RULE 7.1.1 CERTIFICATE The undersigned certifies that counsel for movants have made a reasonable effort to reach agreement with the opposing attorneys on the matters set forth in the attached motion.

/s/ William J. Marsden, Jr. William J. Marsden, Jr.

3

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 266

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 10, 2008, I electronically filed with the Clerk of Court the foregoing document using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filing(s) to the following counsel: Via Email Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Julia Heaney (#3052) Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 Phone: 302-658-9200 Fax: 302-658-3989 Emails: [email protected]; [email protected] Via Email Russell E. Levine, P.C. Michelle W. Skinner/David W. Higer Maria A. Meginnes/Courtney Holohan/C. Beasley Kirkland & Ellis LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Phone: 312-861-2000 Fax: 312-861-2200 Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Courtesy Copy Via Federal Express Michelle W. Skinner Kirkland & Ellis LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Phone: 312-861-2000 Fax: 312-861-2200 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Polaroid Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Polaroid Corporation

/s/ William J. Marsden, Jr. William J. Marsden, Jr.

1
4350686v1

Case 1:06-cv-00738-SLR

Document 266-2

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

POLAROID CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. C.A. No. 06-738-SLR

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S CROSS-MOTION TO PRECLUDE AND NOW, the Court, having considered Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's CrossMotion to Preclude in this case and all supporting memoranda, declarations and exhibits filed by Hewlett-Packard Company and Polaroid Corporation's opposition to the motion and all supporting memoranda, declarations and exhibits, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's Cross-Motion To Preclude is GRANTED. SO ORDERED, this ___ day of _________________, 2008.

The Honorable Sue L. Robinson

4350709v1