Free Response to Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 16.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 8, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 275 Words, 1,744 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37504/7.pdf

Download Response to Order - District Court of Delaware ( 16.4 kB)


Preview Response to Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :06-cv-00770-JJF Document 7 Filed O1/08/2007 Page 1 of 1 4.
. ° IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE :
APPOQUINIMINK SCHOOL DISTRICT, :
And THE DEPARTMENT OF : C.A. No.:06-770
EDUCATION, :
Plaintiffs, :
v. :
JULIE JOHNSON and SAMUEL QUINTON
` JOHNSON, IV, PARENTS OF SAMUEL :
QUINTON, V, . :
ANSWER TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Defendants, JULIE JOHNSON and SAMUEL QUINTON JOHNSON, IV,
PARENTS OF SAMUEL QUINTON, V, by and through their attorney, Patricia M.
O’Neill, Esquire, respond to the Plaintiffs’ Motion as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Denied. FERPA rights belong to the Defendants as Parents and
Guardians of the minor child. Defendants waive their FERPA rights and have no
objection to public access to the information contained her i

/
\·M
P ricia M. O’Neill, Esquire
2 West Front Street
Media, PA 19063
610-891 -6668
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Delaware Supreme Court
Identification No: 3016
Admitted to Delaware District Court
Date: January 8, 2007
2

Case 1:06-cv-00770-JJF Docurnent 7-2 Filed O1/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
,, ·· IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
f FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE :
APPOQUINIMINK SCHOOL DISTRICT, :
And THE DEPARTMENT OF V : C.A. No.:06-770
EDUCATION, :
Plaintiffs, :
v. :
JULIE JOHNSON and SAMUEL QUINTON
JOHNSON, IV, PARENTS OF SAMUEL :
QUINTON, V, :
Defendants. :
ORDER
AND NOW, on this day of , 2007, upon consideration of
Plaintiff s Motion for Leave to File under Seal and the Defendant’s Response thereto;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs’ Motion that the
Complaint shall be tiled under seal is denied.
BY THE COURT:
J.