Free Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 72.6 kB
Pages: 4
Date: January 9, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,067 Words, 7,341 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37547/54.pdf

Download Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware ( 72.6 kB)


Preview Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:O6—cv—OO796-G|\/IS Document 54 Filed O1/O9/2008 Page 1 of 4 I
@i;__;_jfTj‘f3 3 3 33 33 ‘eee ‘‘‘ee’ 3333 4 ‘‘‘’`‘*‘‘‘ 3- 3 L ‘“" - ee,
4 U4s4ummmc¤m4D1s¤a¤v¤fDe1a»vare .: .` - 4 . ‘i. Z4444?44e;3-Si; =e·- 3 »§3€:°b°};¥%‘ié1$?‘5‘-?»?.éi`?L1-;44.»3s3-3*3--£-C3?- `3 ` - .8 mm
WN-I¤¤gS¤¤¤* '433 · ‘4 Q I 3 W I ii 3
Locxennx 18 I i -/4‘. lr 3 I Eé _·3‘*3”°°‘* ·?I
Q1 wi1mmgm¤,D1219s01 g g e~=-.. — 44 a II
3;*4-:4*-Hf 5-; 4 ` —= I_m_"___iL_____ ____ ___"____ . ....... .. ..-.J4I
·_ as we EEE 31.5 us _ *
34 a- 4 ‘‘e -=‘—f -·—¤=¤ · ¤ ·~ -44 - ----e 444 4 I _ 4 ` 3
4" I e;¤` Z `e.4 -23*43 - e.. 4 3 ‘``‘‘.e I- 4- 33 4 3 I
3?33 ‘‘‘‘ 4 fe 3—33#3·Y -e-e L? ,.4 ·**'F .:;,4 4 - 4
K43 3- `33 44 ‘.·. I 4 4_‘‘ '-`4’. _ ·'·_ ji e''_4 4_ *4, {T4- 44-4-lI'"€;3;4‘ QJQ4 Q?4 ·e4_. _ 3 4 4 4 :_ I 4 ° _ 3 !
»e'4 - j- · 4 `- ‘ 4-4e `F `4 3 43 4 f 4 44 · I
`4=‘ -4 4_ - ‘.‘‘- 3 -.4'_ ‘44 4 I 4 I - I
43 43 4 ` -4 4- ·=`‘ *4 V- 4 V --
-44-· l? -3 4 4" 4 -‘--4;;;4 ‘44 §;i41`f;4;__4_;_;4 -‘‘e ; ·e · `'444 4
·‘44 4 4 4 _‘ 3} 3 Q 44 -_
4=?;f44-4;_j4443 .4`4,= 44 4% - 5 ._ § 3 44 4- I `44 __ ”` I
4._4 ` g David 4 Sund t130;% _4 W 44 , I; _ -4·’ r H _ 4
;4 4 $4 Ji-3 3;43’ - - 4 4 -2 4- 4 4444 _ 4-.4 - - 4- =..4
K " 4; -; ZL-: 1`H1'1€f Ot DI`1 ' G _ r ._ j .4 lr ._ : _»
§§`J4444f;$§;'-i4:;jZ,-"i`i`3 Y _ Jacks gvillc, L 3 23-4808 ,-3- ' n -3 ”‘`'3‘ 4 ` I
3 -{rm,5;§LA1"£s\!§D* 44”‘ 4 44 _ 4 Q _ (44.4 4 °`1K 4 4 I
44-4 IL -44- 44ae-44-=s4F4;`§;¤~v¤-M¤2¤*=¤¢°?B 4 -13734 ~ 44 z- - y I
-3--= '-,8-4 3 -- ‘4 4 I- n' ` ’ 4 48
4`4--2 —444 4 4-44 ¢ a ‘‘=I 444_ 4 -34 i 4 4,4 4
I44~8 -·-3¤ - 4*--1 - 8444 3 l I- V 4.3 -4 ` Q 4 ‘
_‘`3 44 L 3 a 4-ZZ344 ` _44-_ 34 - l
444 3 3- 44 ` 3. 44__4__4___4 __ _____ ___ __44 ,____ ____ _,-`-' - 3 3- - - 4
3- -4 ‘ Q ‘ 44 4 3 4 4 ~ L!
44_ 43-- 3 4 :3 4 3 _. -_ 3_g 4 4; 4 *mék$GN¤€{Mc§4¤Fs¤I-.34- j _4 4 E
*3 4434; 3 ‘ ‘ - 34 3 4 3 »34¤43r3F3r32-21 4
I4 4 · 4 4 4 44 44 4 4.€°°?§ LM 44 I
- 3 - ~4-- 4. 4 33 3 4 -4 -¢ ‘- 4 34 33 3 "- *
--33@ -8 88 3 3 ` ‘-- I` 84444.. €
3 I4 -44- 1 3 4 -4 3- 3333 3 3 4- 3 ` - 333 33`3 J- 44 4344 /4->f?f2»I
I;-3r. 4 . · . ` 4 4"
33 4 4- 4 3
C'}
'§ 2%
cn {jj;
5;.3 HL;
2 ‘*_`3,g¤_q
I ¤¤3l:.*
LD Mgqm
-4.
I
1 EQ2
- -· cm
01 $15:
..1
r*\ L
L
U\

Case 1:06—cv—0O796-G|\/IS Document 54 Filed O1/O9/2008 Page 2 of 4
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Peter T. Dallco LOCKBOX 18
CLERK OF COURT 844 me STREET
us. COURTHOUSE
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE mam
(302)573-6170
December 4, 2007
TO: David M. Sundstrom
12029 Cranefoot Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32223-4808
RE: CA 06-796-***-MPT, Harold Toliver, et.al v. Christina
School District, et.al.
Dear Mr.Sundstrom:
Enclosed please find certified copies of the Second Amended
Complaint and Summons in the above captioned case.
Service is made by registered mail pursuant to Delaware Long
Arm statue 10 Del. Code 3114.
_ Sincerely,
. { *
BY: ` z ` JC, PETER T. DALLEO
/Tbe CLERK
Enclosures (as stated) 1
I. c_g_: CA 06-796-***—MPT
i %*~E ITE.: A
ug ,L
R?. E
A EEE T I
°§-·
my I I
y EE
J _,_,_\ ·' 04
LJ

AO 4-40 (Rev. -ieu UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
- District of Delaware
HAROLD TOLLIVER, an individual; ALIAS SUIVIMONS IN A CIVIL CASE
JAMES MCCRINK, an individual;
FEDERATED BANK, an Illinois bank;
LARRY KOLKO, an individual;
RAMONA ROBERSON, an individual;
JANICE FAYHEE, an individual; and CASE NUMBER: 06-769-***
JACQUELINE BEIRNES, an individual;
Plaintiffs,
V.
CHRISTINA SCHOOL DISTRICT;
THRESA GILES, an individual;
DAVTD SUNDSTROM, an individual; and
JOSEPH WISE, an individual,
Defendants.
SCIENTIFIC LEARNING CORPORATION,
Third-Party Defendant.
TOS (Name and address of defendant)
David M. Sundstrom
12029 Cranefoot Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32223-4808
A YOU ARE HEREBY SUl\/[MONED andrequired to serve upon PLA1NT'[FF’S ATTORNEY (name and address)
l i Patricia Smink Rogowski
CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP
1007 N. Orange Street
P.O. Box 2207
Wilmington, DE 19899-2207
an answer to the complaint which is served on you with this summons, within 20 days after service of this summons
on you, exclusive of the day of service. Ifyou fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief
demanded in the complaint. Any answer that you serve on the parties to this action must be filed with the Clerk of this
Court within a reasonable period of time after service.
pgg;gnn;; _n,i.,H:[email protected] . I l¤/¤- in
CLERK DATE GER g I L; O']
_ E AS A TRUE CO 5
ATTEST: c D
(By) DEPUTY CLERK 7· ·q s - |
'i°”‘

Case 1:O6—cv—OO796-GMS Dognijj ____5 Filed O1/OQ/2008 Page 4 of 4
l _ Case 1:06-cv—00796-*** Document 24 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 1 of 21
ll
U h `»
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
HAROLD TOLLIVER, an individual;
JAMES MCCRINK, an individual; _
FEDERATED BANK, an Illinois bank;
LARRY KOLKO, an individual;
RAMONA ROBERSON, an individual;
I ANICE FAYI·IE, an individual; and
JACQUELINE BEIRNES, an individual;
Civil Action No. 06—796—***
Plaintiffs.
v. ·
CHRISTINA SCHOOL DISTRICT;
THRESA GILES, an individual;
DAVID SUNDSTROM, an individual; and
I OSEPH WISE, an individual,
Defendants.
SCIENTIF IC LEARNING CORPORATION,
'I`l:1ird—Party Defendant.
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
I C Plaintiff investors, by and through their undersigned attorneys, state their Second 1 ` I A I
Amended Complaint as follows; .
I. INTRODUCTION r
Despite having promised to do “a1l things lawfully within its power to obtain, maintain,
and properly request and pursue funds" for the payment of a multi—yea1· educational software
. lease, Defendant Christina School District elected to breach the agreement by not melting the
required payment on July 15, 2006. When pressed for the past-due payment, the School District
attempted to terminate the agreement in violation of its express provisions. As a result of the