Free Declaration - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 183.7 kB
Pages: 4
Date: March 7, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,029 Words, 6,382 Characters
Page Size: 612.48 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37884/4.pdf

Download Declaration - District Court of Delaware ( 183.7 kB)


Preview Declaration - District Court of Delaware
l
Case 1 :07-cv-00137-SLR Document 4 Filed O3/07/2007 Page 1 of 4 1
R. ERIC HUTZ (#2702)
CONN OLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ _
Attomeys for Plaintiff `
The Nemours Building
1007 N. Orange Street .
Wilmington, DE 19899
Phone (302) 658-9141
LARRY R. LAYCOCK (pro hac vice application to be filed)
CHAD E. NYDEGGER (pro hac vice application to be filed)
WORKMAN NYDEGGER
1000 Eagle Gate Tower
60 East South Temple .
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Telephone: (801) 533-9800
‘ ‘ Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUN OPTICS, INC.
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
I DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
SUN OPTICS, INC., a Utah Corporation, ) _ _ _
· ) C1v11 Action No.
Piaimlrg g
v_ ) DECLARATION OF BRUCE RAILE
` ) IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S
Fox INTERNATIONAL, mc., a Delaware ) MOTIGN FOR A
‘ Corporation, ‘“ “‘“‘ ) PRELIMINARY INJU N CTION
( )
1 , Defendant. ) _
2 _ ) Filed March 7, 2007
_ )
\ Bruce Raile, declarant herein, declares as follows:
I 1. I am a citizen of the United States, am over the age of 21, and am competent to
testify to the matters set_ forth herein.
2. I am the President, CEO, and co-founder of Sun Optics, Inc. ("Sun Optics"),
Plaintiff in the above—captioned matter.

Case 1:07-cv-00137-SLR Document 4 Filed O3/07/2007 Page 2 of 4
3. Sun Optics designs and sells innovative eye glasses, eye glass cases, and eye glass l
displays, which it combines into a complete merchandising program for reading glasses. Foster
Grant also is a distributor of various products, including eye glasses and eye glass cases.
4. Sun Optics has invented and developed an innovative merchandising program that
has proven very successful in the market place. This new merchandising program includes
displaying the reading glasses in reading glass cases that are protected by the ’427 and ’l80
patents. Products incorporating the designs of the ’427 and ’l80 patents are referred as "Clear
Tubes" because the clear upper portion of the reading glass case allows consumers to view the
style of glasses without having to take the glasses out of the display. Sun Optics’s used its Clear
Tube merchandising program was to secure a contract to sell this program through the Rite Aid
national chain of stores. This shelf space awarded to Sun Optics by Rite Aid was taken from
Foster Grant.
5. In approximately late 2006, a few months after Rite Aid took shelf space from
Foster Grant and awarded it to Sun Optics, Foster Grant launched a knock-off of Sun Optics’s
Clear Tube merchandising system. Foster Grant copied Sun Optics’s patented reading glass case
designs from the opaque bottom half to clear top half of the case, including the silver band in the
middle and silver cap at the top. Foster Grant also copied the Sun Optics’s displays, using
displays with the identical number of glasses in each display, and an identical mix and
arrangement of large and small reading glass cases. Last, Foster Grant copied at least tive
different styles of Sun Optics’s reading glasses. In sum, Foster Grant has copied virtually every
aspect of Sun Optics’s reading glass merchandising system, including the reading glass case
designs of the ’427 and ’l80 patents.
6. In the reading glasses market, vendors of reading glasses typically obtain accounts
with retail customers who carry the manufacturer’s products and sell them to consumers. The
i normal course is for retail customers to enter into an exclusive contract with a vendor. These
l contracts, however, also typically include a provision that allows the retail customer to carry
1 .
< 2

Case 1:07-cv-00137-SLR Document 4 Filed O3/07/2007 Page 3 of 4 i
certain products of different vendors if those products are not offered by the original vendor
4 under the exclusive contract. Further, retailers who do not sign exclusive contracts with reading
glasses vendors still typically carry the product of only one vendor because it is less hassle for
the retailer to deal with one vendor as opposed to numerous vendors. Again, the exception to
this practice is that retailers add the product of a second vendor if it cannot obtain the desired i
product from the first vendor.
7. Prior to Foster Grant’s infringement of Sun Optics’s patents, Sun Optics has been
able to use its innovative reading glass case designs to obtain accounts with retailers that carry
the product of another vendor because Sun Optics was the only vendor offering the innovative
Clear Tube merchandising program. For example, Sun Optics was able to obtain a contract with
the Rite Aid national chain of stores to carry Sun Optics’s Clear Tube products, despite Rite
Aid’s prior contract to carry Foster Grant’s product as explained above. Had Foster Grant been
offering its infringing Clear Tube program at the time Sun Optics approached Rite Aid, it is very
unlikely that Sun Optics would have been able to obtain an account and contract with Rite Aid.
Since entering the Rite Aid stores, Rite Aid has taken additional shelf space from Foster Grant
p and given it to Sun Optics because Sun Optics’s Clear Tubes out sold Foster Grant’s reading
glasses when marketed side-by-side in Rite Aid stores. A
8. Before Foster Grant began copying Sun Optics’s Clear Tube program, Sun Optics
was able to market its innovative Clear Tube program as a program available exclusively from
Sun Optics. The innovative nature of Srm Optics’s Clear Tubes coupled with Sun Optics’s as the
exclusive source for the Clear Tubes enabled Sun Optics to obtain appointments to pitch it Clear
Tube program to retailers, like Rite Aid, that were already carrying the product of another
vendor. Since Foster Grant began marketing its copy-cat Clear Tube program, Sun Optics has
been met with new resistance from some retail customers. Retailers no longer view Sun Optics
as the exclusive source of Clear Tubes. Consequently, some retailers have refused even to give
Sun Optics an appointment to pitch its Clear Tube program.
3

Case 1:07-cv-00137-SLR Document 4 Filed O3/07/2007 Page 4 of 4 1
l
I have read the foregoing declaration and declare under penalties of perjury that the
contents thereof are true and correct of my own personal knowledge.
Dated this 2 day of March, 2007.
4