Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 65.2 kB
Pages: 11
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 2,935 Words, 17,964 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38136/22.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 65.2 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS

Document 22-3

Filed 08/13/2007

Page 1 of 1

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 11 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ALMA LASERS, LTD., and ALMA LASERS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. THERMAGE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 07-224 - * * *

SCHEDULING ORDER This ____ day of August, 2007, the Court having conducted an Initial Rule 16 scheduling and planning conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(a) on August 7, 2007, and the parties having determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement, voluntary mediation, or binding arbitration: IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and E-Discovery Default Standard.

The Parties have agreed to make their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) by August 13, 2007. The Parties have reviewed the Court's Default Standard for Discovery of Electronic Documents, which is incorporated herein by reference. The parties are discussing certain modifications and/or alternatives to the Court's Default Standard. 2. Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to

join other parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings shall be filed on or before February 11, 2008.

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 22 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

3.

Discovery. a. Limitation on Hours for Deposition Discovery. Each side is

limited to a total of 100 hours of taking testimony by deposition upon oral examination. This limitation does not apply to depositions of expert witnesses. Alma will be allowed to depose inventor Knowlton for up to 21 hours (or more upon a showing of good cause). b. Locations of Depositions. Any party or representative (officer,

director or managing agent) of a party filing a civil action in this district court must ordinarily be required, upon request, to submit to a deposition at a place designated within this district, or to a place mutually agreed upon by counsel to the parties. Exceptions to this general rule may be made by order of the Court. A defendant who becomes a counterclaimant, cross-claimant, or third-party plaintiff shall be considered as having filed an action in this Court for the purpose of this provision. c. Fact Discovery Cut-Off. All fact discovery in this case shall be

initiated so that it will be completed on or before July 6, 2008. The Court encourages the parties to serve and respond to contention interrogatories early in the case. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the limitations on discovery set forth in Local Rule 26.1 shall be strictly observed. (1) Document Production. With the exception of documents

relating to issues concerning alleged damages, document production shall begin as soon as practicable and shall continue on a rolling basis. Production of documents relating to issues concerning alleged damages shall begin as soon as practicable after January 7, 2008.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 33 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

(2) interrogatories. (3)

Interrogatories. Each side may serve up to 50

Requests for Admission. Each side may serve up to 50

requests for admission, not including requests directed to the authentication of documents and the proper translation of foreign documents. A question following up on a response to a request for admission counts as an interrogatory. (4) Service. The Parties agree that service of discovery,

motions, or other materials during this case shall be made on lead counsel of record (with copies to all counsel of record) by hand-delivery, facsimile, or e-mail. If service was made by facsimile or e-mail on a particular counsel, a confirmation hard copy shall be sent overnight mail to that counsel. Exhibits to such materials are not required to be served with an e-mail or facsimile provided that the exhibits are served with the confirmation hard copy by overnight delivery. However, if a party chooses to serve such exhibits with the corresponding materials by e-mail or facsimile, confirmation hard copies may be served by First Class mail instead of overnight mail. Service by facsimile or e-mail shall be considered served on the date faxed or e-mailed provided that any necessary confirmation hard copies were sent by overnight mail in accordance with this paragraph. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude any party from otherwise serving materials not filed with the Court by any other acceptable service methods under the Federal Rules. d. Disclosure of Expert Testimony. For the party who has the initial

burden of proof on the subject matter, the initial Federal Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert testimony is due on or before August 6, 2008. The supplemental disclosure to

3

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 44 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

contradict or rebut evidence on the same matter identified by another party is due on or before September 8, 2008. Along with the submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall advise of the dates and times of their experts' availability for deposition. All expert discovery in this case shall be completed on or before October 17, 2008. e. To the extent any objection to expert testimony is made pursuant

to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it shall be made by motion no later than the deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. f. Discovery Disputes. Should counsel find they are unable to

resolve a discovery dispute, the party seeking the relief shall contact chambers at (302) 573-6173 to schedule a telephone conference. Not less than forty-eight hours prior to the conference, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. (The Court does not seek extensive argument or authorities at this point; it seeks simply a statement of the issue to be addressed and a summary of the basis for the party's position on the issue.) Not less than twenty-four hours prior to the conference, any party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining that party's reasons for its opposition. Should any document(s) be filed under seal, a copy of the sealed document(s) must be provided to the Magistrate Judge within one (1) hour of e-filing the document(s). Should the Court find further briefing necessary upon conclusion of the telephone conference, the Court will order it.

4

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 55 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

Disputes over protective orders are to be addressed in the first instance in accordance with this paragraph. g. Fact Witnesses to be Called at Trial. On September 15, 2008,

each party shall serve on the other parties a list of each fact witness (including any expert witness who is also expected to give fact testimony), who has previously been disclosed during discovery and that it intends to call at trial. On October 15, 2008, each party shall serve a list of each rebuttal fact witness that it intends to call at trial. The parties shall have the right to depose any such fact witnesses who have not previously been deposed in this case. Such deposition shall be held within one (1) month after service of the list of rebuttal fact witnesses and shall be limited to twenty (20) hours per side in the aggregate unless extended by agreement of the parties or upon order of the Court upon good cause shown. h. Disclosure of Opinions of Counsel. On or before May 2, 2008,

Alma must produce to Thermage any opinion of counsel that Alma intends to rely upon to rebut Thermage's allegation of willful infringement. i. Limited Early Discovery Related to Harmony Product. [Alma:

Initial discovery related to Alma's Harmony product shall be limited to user and installation manuals, operator manuals, and similar types of materials. (See Hr'g Tr. 8:20-24)] [Thermage: Initial discovery related to Alma's Harmony product shall be limited to materials that provide guidance to users on how to deploy and use the Harmony product. Examples of such material are user manuals, installation manuals, operating manuals, instructions for use (IFU), procedure guidelines, quick start guidance, technical bulletins, and similar labeling. These

5

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 66 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

materials may be provided to users in written form, as part of webinars, DVD, videotape, and similar types of materials.] 4. Application to the Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find it

will be necessary to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the disclosure of confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order and submit it to the Court within ten days from the date of this Order. Should counsel be unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order, the counsel must first follow the provisions of paragraph 3f above. Any proposed order should include the following paragraph: Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the disclosure of information in this case, the Court does not intend to preclude another court from finding that the information may be relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or party subject to this order who becomes subject to a motion to disclose another party's information designated "confidential" [the parties shoulsd list any other level of designation, such as "highly confidential," which may be provided for in the protective order] pursuant to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion so that the party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard on whether the information should be disclosed. 5. Papers Filed Under Seal. When filing papers under seal, counsel should

deliver to the Clerk an original and one copy of the papers. 6. process. 7. Interim Status Report. On January 31, 2008, counsel shall submit a ADR Process. Counsel will continue to discuss the possibility of an ADR

letter to the Court with an interim report on the nature of the matters in issue and the progress of discovery to date.

6

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 77 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

8.

Status Conference. On February 7, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. EST, the Court

will hold a Rule 16(a), (b), and (c) conference by telephone with counsel. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the phone call. At the time of this conference, counsel shall also be prepared to discuss the progress, if any, of settlement discussions and shall be prepared to discuss the possibility of setting up a settlement conference with the Court, counsel, and their clients. If all parties agree that there is nothing to report, nor anything to add to the interim status report or to this order, they shall notify the Court in writing before the conference is scheduled to occur, and the conference will be taken off the Court's calendar. 9. Tutorial Describing the Technology and Matters in Issue. a. The parties shall provide the Court by November 5, 2008, a

tutorial on the technology at issue. In that regard, each party may submit a videotape/CD of not more than 30 minutes. The parties may choose to present the tutorial in person. In either event, the tutorial should focus on the technology in issue and should not be used to argue the parties' claim construction contentions. If the parties choose to file videotapes/CDs, they should be filed under seal as part of the Court's file, subject to any protective order in effect. Each party may comment, in writing (in no more than 5 pages) on the opposing party's videotape/CD tutorial. Any such comment shall be filed within ten (10) days of submission of the videotapes/CDs. As to the format selected, the parties should confirm the Court's technical abilities to access the information contained in the tutorial. b. The tentative date and time for the parties to present tutorials to

the Court in person is November 21, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. EST.

7

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 88 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

10.

Case Dispositive Motions. All case dispositive motions, an opening

brief, and affidavits, if any, in support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before October 8, 2008. Briefing will be presented pursuant to the Court's Local Rules. 11. a. Claim Construction Issue Identification. Narrowing of Asserted Claims. (1) Thermage will identify no more than 167 claims that it may

potentially assert by December 31, 2007. (2) Thermage will narrow its list of asserted claims to no more than 83

claims by March 3, 2008. (3) Thermage will further narrow its list of asserted claims to no more

than 20-25 claims in total by July 1, 2008. Thermage need not file anything with the Court at each narrowing milestone. b. Issue Identification. If the Court does not find that a limited earlier claim

construction would be helpful in resolving the case, on August 4, 2008, the parties shall exchange a list of those claim term(s)/phrase(s) that they believe need construction and their proposed claim construction of those term(s)/phrase(s). This document will not be filed with the Court. Subsequent to exchanging that list, the parties will meet and confer to prepare a Joint Claim Construction Chart to be submitted on September 8, 2008. The parties' Joint Claim Construction Chart should identify for the Court the term(s)/phrase(s) of the claim(s) in issue, and should include each party's proposed construction of the disputed claim language with citation(s) only to the intrinsic evidence in support of their respective proposed constructions. A copy of the patent(s) in issue as well as those portions of the intrinsic record relied upon shall

8

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 99 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page of 10

be submitted with this Joint Claim Construction Chart. In this joint submission, the parties shall not provide argument. 12. Claim Construction. The parties shall contemporaneously submit initial

briefs on claim construction issues on October 6, 2008. The parties' answering/responsive briefs shall be contemporaneously submitted on November 5, 2008. No reply briefs or supplemental papers on claim construction shall be submitted without leave of the Court. Local Rule 7.1.3(4) shall control the page limitation for initial (opening) and responsive (answering) briefs. 13. Hearing on Claim Construction. On approximately December 3, 2008,

the Court will hear evidence and argument on claim construction and summary judgment. 14. Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any

application to the Court shall be by written motion filed with the Clerk. Unless otherwise requested by the Court, counsel shall not deliver copies of papers or correspondence to Chambers. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement required by Local Rule 7.1.1. 15. Pretrial Conference. On approximately March 4, 2009, the Court will

hold a Final Pretrial Conference in Chambers with counsel. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties should assume that filing the pretrial order satisfies the pretrial disclosure requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall file with the Court the joint proposed final pretrial order with the information required by the form of Final Pretrial Order which accompanies this Scheduling Order on or before February 18, 2009.

9

Case 1:07-cv-00224-GMS Document 22-2 Case 1:07-cv-00224-*** Document 22-4

Filed 08/13/2007 Page 10 of 10 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 10 of 10

16.

Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in

limine requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each party shall be limited to five in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in limine request may be supported by a maximum of three pages of argument and may be opposed by a maximum of three pages of argument. If more than one party is supporting or opposing an in limine request, such support or opposition shall be combined in a single three (3) page submission, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. 15. Jury Instructions, Voir Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a

case is to be tried to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47 and 51 the parties should file proposed voir dire, instructions to the jury, and special verdict forms and jury interrogatories three full business days before the final pretrial conference. That submission shall be accompanied by a computer diskette (in WordPerfect format) which contains the instructions, proposed voir dire, special verdict forms, and jury interrogatories. 16. Trial. This matter is scheduled for a 9-day jury trial beginning at 9:00

a.m. on approximately March 17, 2009. For the purpose of completing pretrial preparations, counsel should tentatively plan on each side being allocated a total of 24 hours to present their case.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
183144.1

CH1 3958650v.1

10