Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cr-00060-GIVIS Document 8 Filed O4/24/2007 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
_ FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : _
Plaintiff, I
v. Criminal Action No. 07 — @0 · tl rl Q
DAVID HANCOCK and
Defendants. z I i —._ill;U t Qi A -”__ _ A
INDICT MEN T
I The Federal Grand Jury for the District of Delaware charges that:
I COUNT I —
On or about April 11, 2007, in the State and District of Delaware, DAVID HANCOCK
and MIGUEL ALCANTARA, defendants herein, did knowingly conspire together and with each
other, to possess with intent to distribute five hundred (500) grams or more of a mixture and- A
· substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine, a controlled substance, in violation of Title
. 21, United States Code, Sections 8Tll(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). l
All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 and Title 18, United States
Code, Section 2. I _
8 I - COUNT II A .
On or about April 11, 2007, in the State and District of Deieweie, DAVID HANCOCK- · I
i. I V and MIGUEL ALCANT ARA, defendants herein, did knowingly attempt to possess with intent to
distribute five hundred (500) grams or Imore of a mixture and substance containing a detectable _
ennennrer cocaine, a controlled substance, in violation of Title 21, United St_ates Code, Sections l

Case 1:07-cr-00060-GIVIS Document 8 Filed O4/24/2007 Page 2 of 3
I 841(a)(1) and (b)-(1)(B) and 846, and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.
COUNT III
On or about April 11, 2007, in the State and District of Delaware, MIGUEL
ALCANTARA, defendant herein, did knowingly possess, with intent to distribute, a mixture and
substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base, a controlled substance, in violation of
21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(B); V
I COUNT IV _
On or about April 11, 2007, in the State and District of Delaware, MIGUEL,
ALCANTARA, defendant herein, did knowingly possess marijuana, a controlled substance, in
violation of21 U.S.C. § 844. .
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE
Upon conviction of one or more of the controlled substance offenses alleged. in Counts I—
_ above, DAVID HANCOCK and MIGUEL ALCANTARA, defendants herein, shall forfeit to
‘ the United States pursuantto 21 U.S.C. § 853, any property constituting, or derived Hom,. l
· - proceedsobtained, directly or indirectly, as a result cf the said violations and any property used,
or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to corrmit, or to facilitate the commission of the
said violations, including but not limited to: . V l
$25 ,370.00 in United States Currency, and U I
$1,100.00 in United States Currency. l - .
- Ifany of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the
_ defendants: ‘ i " . l l _
(1) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; l -

Case 1:07-cr-00060-GIVIS Document 8 Filed O4/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
(3) ‘ has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
(4) has been substantially diminished in value; or
(5) has been cornmingled with other property which cannot be divided without
p difficulty; .
_ it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 2l U.S.C. § 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any
U other property of said defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property described above.
A TRUE BILL:
V . Foreperson `
COLM F. CONNOLLY
U United States Attorney ` V
Byi @M..4L1 I (C . . .. ._ _
Dougl E. McCann -
Assistant United States Attorney
Date; April 24, 2007- . ` l in A
A 3