Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS

Document 57

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 11 of 11

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-2 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 1 of 7 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-2 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 2 of 7 Page 2 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-2 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 3 of 7 Page 3 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-2 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 4 of 7 Page 4 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-2 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 5 of 7 Page 5 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-2 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 6 of 7 Page 6 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-2 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 7 of 7 Page 7 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-3 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 1 of 55 Page 1 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 2 of 55 Page 2 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 3 of 55 Page 3 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 4 of 55 Page 4 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 5 of 55 Page 5 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 6 of 55 Page 6 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 7 of 55 Page 7 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 8 of 55 Page 8 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 9 of 55 Page 9 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 10 of 55 Page 10 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 11 of 55 Page 11 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 12 of 55 Page 12 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 13 of 55 Page 13 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 14 of 55 Page 14 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 15 of 55 Page 15 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 16 of 55 Page 16 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 17 of 55 Page 17 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 18 of 55 Page 18 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 19 of 55 Page 19 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 20 of 55 Page 20 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 21 of 55 Page 21 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 22 of 55 Page 22 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 23 of 55 Page 23 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 24 of 55 Page 24 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 25 of 55 Page 25 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 26 of 55 Page 26 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 27 of 55 Page 27 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 28 of 55 Page 28 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 29 of 55 Page 29 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 30 of 55 Page 30 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 31 of 55 Page 31 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 32 of 55 Page 32 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 33 of 55 Page 33 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 34 of 55 Page 34 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 35 of 55 Page 35 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 36 of 55 Page 36 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 37 of 55 Page 37 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 38 of 55 Page 38 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 39 of 55 Page 39 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 40 of 55 Page 40 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 41 of 55 Page 41 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 42 of 55 Page 42 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 43 of 55 Page 43 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 44 of 55 Page 44 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 45 of 55 Page 45 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 46 of 55 Page 46 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 47 of 55 Page 47 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 48 of 55 Page 48 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 49 of 55 Page 49 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 50 of 55 Page 50 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 51 of 55 Page 51 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 52 of 55 Page 52 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 53 of 55 Page 53 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 54 of 55 Page 54 of 55

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-4 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 1-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/13/2006

Page 55 of 55 Page 55 of 55

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-5 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 2

Filed 09/13/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-6 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 3

Filed 09/20/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-7 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 4

Filed 09/22/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-7 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 4

Filed 09/22/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-8 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 6

Filed 09/27/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-9 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 7-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/29/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. TIME WARNER CABLE INC. § § § § §

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-369 [TJW] JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

TIME WARNER CABLE INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND Defendant TIME WARNER CABLE INC. ("TWC"), moves the Court for an extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond, in any manner whatsoever, to Plaintiff REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP'S Complaint, and would respectfully show the Court as follows: 1. Plaintiff REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP ("REMBRANDT") filed its

complaint against TWC on or about September 13, 2006 [Dkt. 1]. 2. The issues involved in this case are such that TWC requests additional time to

prepare a response. 3. TWC respectfully requests a thirty (30) day extension of time to answer, move, or

otherwise respond, in any manner whatsoever, to Plaintiff's complaint up to and including November 9, 2006. 4. Plaintiff REMBRANDT is not opposed to this Motion.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays that the Court grant this Motion for Extension of Time by extending the time period for TIME WARNER CABLE INC. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including November 9, 2006.

{A53\7477\0004\W0312463.1 }

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-9 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 7-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/29/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Dated: September 29, 2006

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Diane V. DeVasto Michael E. Jones Texas State Bar No. 10929400 Diane V. DeVasto State Bar No. 05784100 POTTER MINTON, P.C. 110 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

Of Counsel: David S. Benyacar KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 836-8000 Facsimile: (212) 836-8689 [email protected]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on September 29, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date.

/s/ Diane V. DeVasto

{A53\7477\0004\W0312463.1 }

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CEDocument 57-10 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 7-2

Filed 06/28/2007 09/29/2006

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. TIME WARNER CABLE INC. § § § § §

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-369 [TJW] JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

ORDER GRANTING TIME WARNER CABLE INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND ON THIS DAY, came on to be heard Defendant TIME WARNER CABLE INC.'S Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint of Plaintiff REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP in the above-styled and numbered cause. After considering said Motion, and the entire record in this cause, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion shall be in all things GRANTED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant TIME WARNER CABLE INC. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to and including November 9, 2006.

{A53\7477\0004\W0312463.1 }

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-11 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 8

Filed 10/04/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 11of 11 Page of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. TIME WARNER CABLE INC. § § § § §

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-369 [TJW] JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

ORDER GRANTING TIME WARNER CABLE INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND ON THIS DAY, came on to be heard Defendant TIME WARNER CABLE INC.'S Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint of Plaintiff REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP in the above-styled and numbered cause. After considering said Motion, and the entire record in this cause, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion shall be in all things GRANTED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant TIME WARNER CABLE INC. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to and including November 9, 2006.

SIGNED this 3rd day of October, 2006.

__________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

{A53\7477\0004\W0312463.1 }

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-12 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 9

Filed 10/04/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 11of 22 Page of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. TIME WARNER CABLE INC. § § § § §

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-369 [TJW] JURY DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. (hereinafter "TWC"), files this its Notice of Appearance of Additional Counsel, and hereby notifies the Court that Michael E. Jones of the law firm Potter Minton, A Professional Corporation, 110 N. College, Suite 500, Tyler, Texas 75702, is appearing as additional counsel for TWC in the above-referenced matter. All pleadings, discovery, correspondence and other material should be served upon counsel at the address referenced above. Respectfully submitted, POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702) P. O. Box 359 Tyler, Texas 75710 (903) 597 8311 (903) 593 0846 (Facsimile) By: /s/ Michael E. Jones MICHAEL E. JONES State Bar No. 10929400 [email protected]

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

{A07\7477\0004\W0312999.1 }

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-12 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 9

Filed 10/04/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 22of 22 Page of

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service and are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV5(a)(3) on October 4, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date.

/s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones

___

{A07\7477\0004\W0312999.1 }

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-13 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 10

Filed 10/12/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-14 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 11

Filed 10/12/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-15 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 12

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 8 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. TIME WARNER CABLE INC. § § § § §

CASE NO. 2:06cv369 [TJW] JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

TIME WARNER CABLE INC.'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. ("TWC"), by its undersigned counsel, responds to the allegations asserted in the Complaint of Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Rembrandt") as follows: 1. TWC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of

the allegations made in paragraph 1 of the Complaint, and on that basis denies those allegations. 2. TWC admits the allegations of paragraph 2 of the Complaint that it is a Delaware

corporation, that its "registered agent for service of process in Texas is CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Dallas, Texas 75201," that it conducts business in Texas and within this judicial district, and that it operates cable television systems in the United States. denies the remaining allegations made in paragraph 2 of the Complaint. 3. Paragraph 3 of the Complaint sets forth legal conclusions for which no response TWC

is required. To the extent paragraph 3 contains factual allegations to which a response is required, those allegations are denied. 4. TWC admits the allegations of paragraph 4 of the Complaint that this Court has

personal jurisdiction over it, and that "TWC has conducted and does conduct business with (sic within) the State of Texas." TWC denies the remaining allegations of paragraph 4 of the Complaint. TWC is not infringing, and has not in the past infringed, any of the patents identified in the Complaint.

{A53\7477\0002\W0314981.1 }

1

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-15 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 12

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 8 Page 2 of 8

5.

Paragraph 5 of the Complaint sets forth legal conclusions for which no response is

required. To the extent paragraph 5 contains factual allegations to which a response is required, those allegations are denied. COUNT I 6. TWC restates and realleges its responses to paragraphs 1-5 of the Complaint and

incorporates them herein by reference. 7. TWC admits that a copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,008,903 (the "'903 patent") was

attached to the Complaint as Exhibit A when served. TWC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations made in paragraph 7 of the Complaint, and on that basis denies those allegations. 8. TWC admits that the '903 patent was issued by the United States Patent and

Trademark Office ("the PTO") on April 16, 1991. TWC denies the remaining allegations made in paragraph 8 of the Complaint. 9. 10. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 9 of the Complaint. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 10 of the Complaint. COUNT II 11. TWC restates and realleges its responses to paragraphs 1-5 of the Complaint and

incorporates them herein by reference. 12. TWC admits that a copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,710,761 (the "'761 patent") was

attached to the Complaint as Exhibit B when served. TWC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations made in paragraph 12 of the Complaint, and on that basis denies those allegations.

{A53\7477\0002\W0314981.1 }

2

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-15 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 12

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 8 Page 3 of 8

13.

TWC admits that the '761 patent was issued by the PTO on January 20, 1998.

TWC denies the remaining allegations made in paragraph 13 of the Complaint. 14. 15. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 14 of the Complaint. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 15 of the Complaint. COUNT III 16. TWC restates and realleges its responses to paragraphs 1-5 of the Complaint and

incorporates them herein by reference. 17. TWC admits that a copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,778,234 (the "'234 patent") was

attached to the Complaint as Exhibit C when served. TWC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations made in paragraph 17 of the Complaint, and on that basis denies those allegations. 18. TWC admits that the '234 patent was issued by the PTO on July 7, 1998. TWC

denies the remaining allegations made in paragraph 18 of the Complaint. 19. 20. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 19 of the Complaint. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 20 of the Complaint. COUNT IV 21. TWC restates and realleges its responses to paragraphs 1-5 of the Complaint and

incorporates them herein by reference. 22. TWC admits that a copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,131,159 (the "'159 patent") was

attached to the Complaint as Exhibit D when served. TWC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations made in paragraph 22 of the Complaint, and on that basis denies those allegations.

{A53\7477\0002\W0314981.1 }

3

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-15 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 12

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 8 Page 4 of 8

23.

TWC admits that the '159 patent was issued by the PTO on October 10, 2000.

TWC denies the remaining allegations made in paragraph 23 of the Complaint. 24. 25. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 24 of the Complaint. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 25 of the Complaint. COUNT V 26. TWC restates and realleges its responses to paragraphs 1-5 of the Complaint and

incorporates them herein by reference. 27. TWC admits that a copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,950,444 (the "'444 patent") was

attached to the Complaint as Exhibit E when served. TWC lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations made in paragraph 27 of the Complaint, and on that basis denies those allegations. 28. TWC admits that the '444 patent was issued by the PTO on September 27, 2005.

TWC denies the remaining allegations made in paragraph 28 of the Complaint. 29. 30. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 29 of the Complaint. TWC denies the allegations of paragraph 30 of the Complaint. AFFIRMATIVE AND OTHER DEFENSES TWC sets forth the following affirmative and other defenses. TWC does not intend hereby to assume the burden of proof with respect to those matters as to which, pursuant to law, Plaintiff Rembrandt bears the burden.

{A53\7477\0002\W0314981.1 }

4

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-15 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 12

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 8 Page 5 of 8

FIRST DEFENSE 31. Each of the claims of the '903, '761, '234, '159 and '444 patents is invalid for

failure to satisfy the provisions of one or more of sections 101, 102, 103, and/or 112 of Title 35 of the United States Code. SECOND DEFENSE 32. TWC does not manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, or import into the United

States any product or method that infringes any claim of the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents and it has not done so in the past. TWC also does not contribute to or induce

infringement of the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents and it has not done so in the past. TWC does not infringe, and has not in the past infringed, either directly or indirectly, the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents. THIRD DEFENSE 33. The Complaint's claims are barred by the doctrine of estoppel. FOURTH DEFENSE 34. The Complaint's claims are barred by the doctrine of laches. COUNTERCLAIMS PARTIES 1. Counterclaimant Time Warner Cable Inc. ("TWC") is a Delaware corporation

having its corporate headquarters at 290 Harbor Drive, Stamford, CT 06902.

{A53\7477\0002\W0314981.1 }

5

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-15 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 12

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 6 of 8 Page 6 of 8

2.

Counterclaim defendant Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Rembrandt") purports to

be a limited partnership organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey with its principal place of business at 401 City Avenue, Suite 815, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. and 2202. 4. This Court has jurisdiction over these counterclaims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ These counterclaims seek a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201

1331, 1338 and 1367. 5. 6. Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400. A justifiable controversy exists between Counterclaimant TWC and Rembrandt

with respect to the invalidity and non-infringement of the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,008,903 (the "'903 patent"), 5,710,761 (the "'761 patent"), 5,778,234 (the "'234 patent"), 6,131,159 (the "'159 patent") and 6,950,444 (the "'444 patent"). FIRST COUNTERCLAIM 7. TWC hereby repeats and reiterates the allegations made in paragraphs 1-6 of these

Counterclaims as if fully set forth herein. 8. Each of the claims of the '903, '761, '234, '159 and '444 patents is invalid for

failure to satisfy the provisions of one or more of sections 101, 102, 103, and/or 112 of Title 35 of the United States Code. SECOND COUNTERCLAIM 9. TWC hereby repeats and reiterates the allegations made in paragraphs 1-8 of these

Counterclaims as if fully set forth herein.

{A53\7477\0002\W0314981.1 }

6

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-15 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 12

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 7 of 8 Page 7 of 8

10.

TWC does not manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, or import into the United

States any product or method that infringes any claim of the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents and it has not done so in the past. TWC also does not contribute to or induce

infringement of the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents and it has not done so in the past. TWC does not infringe, and has not in the past infringed, either directly or indirectly, the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents. WHEREFORE, Defendant and Counterclaimant TWC prays that: a) b) '444 patents; c) The Court declare that TWC does not manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, or The Court dismiss all of Rembrandt's claims against TWC with prejudice; The Court declare invalid each of the claims of the '903, '761, '234, '159 and

import into the United States any product or method that infringes any of the claims of the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents and has not done so in the past, and that TWC therefore and otherwise does not directly infringe the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents and has not done so in the past; d) The Court declare that TWC does not contribute to or induce infringement of the

'903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents and it has not done so in the past, and that TWC therefore and otherwise does not indirectly infringe the '903, '761, '234, '159 or '444 patents and has not done so in the past; e) f) g) proper. TWC be awarded its costs in this action; TWC be awarded its attorneys fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; and TWC be awarded such other and further relief as this Court deems is just and

{A53\7477\0002\W0314981.1 }

7

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-15 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 12

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 8 of 8 Page 8 of 8

Dated: November 9, 2006

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Diane V. DeVasto Michael E. Jones Texas State Bar No. 10929400 Diane V. DeVasto State Bar No. 05784100 POTTER MINTON, P.C. 110 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on November 9, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date.

/s/ Diane V. DeVasto

{A53\7477\0002\W0314981.1 }

8

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-16 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 13

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. TIME WARNER CABLE INC. § § § § §

CASE NO. 2:06cv369 [TJW] JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 7.1, Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. states that it is a Delaware corporation owned by Adelphia Communications Corporation and, through indirect subsidiaries, by Time Warner Inc. Corporation are publicly held companies. Time Warner Inc. and Adelphia Communications

Dated: November 9, 2006

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Diane V. DeVasto Michael E. Jones Texas State Bar No. 10929400 Diane V. DeVasto State Bar No. 05784100 POTTER MINTON, P.C. 110 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

{A53\7477\0004\W0314980.1 }

1

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-16 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 13

Filed 11/09/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on November 9, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date.

/s/ Diane V. DeVasto

{A53\7477\0004\W0314980.1 }

2

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-17 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 14

Filed 11/10/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-18 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 15

Filed 11/21/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 5 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-18 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 15

Filed 11/21/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 5 Page 2 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-18 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 15

Filed 11/21/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 5 Page 3 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-18 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 15

Filed 11/21/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 5 Page 4 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-18 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 15

Filed 11/21/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 5 Page 5 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-19 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 16

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 6 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendant, § § § § § § § § §

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv00369-TJW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Rembrandt") moves for leave to amend the Original Complaint to add four subsidiaries of Defendant Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC") as defendants. The proposed amended complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit A. In support of this motion, Rembrandt shows the Court the following: 1. Prior to March 2003, TWI Cable ("TWI"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Time

Warner Inc., and Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. ("TWE") owned all of Time Warner's cable systems.1 In March 2003, Time Warner created TWC as a majority owned subsidiary, and consolidated the assets and liabilities of Time Warner's cable operations under TWC.2 After the consolidation, TWI ceased to exist, but TWE continued to own cable systems under TWC.

1

AOL Time Warner, Inc. 2001 10K at 8; AOL Time Warner, Inc. 2002 10K at 7, attached as exhibits 1-2 to Declaration of Brooke A. M. Taylor.
2

Time Warner Inc. 2003 10K at 2, attached as exhibit 3 to the declaration of Brooke A. M. Taylor; AOL Time Warner Inc. 2002 10K at 1 & 7, attached as exhibit 2 to the declaration of Brooke A. M. Taylor (All of Time
(continued...)

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-19 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 16

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 6 Page 2 of 6

2.

Today, TWC is the second largest cable operator in the United States with over 14

million cable subscribers.3 In a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, TWC identified four entities as owning the cable systems that serve TWC's subscribers: Time Warner Cable LLC ("TWCL") which owns cable systems that serve approximately 1.0 million subscribers; Time Warner NY Cable LLC ("TWNY") which owns cable systems that serve approximately 4.4 million subscribers; TWE which owns cable systems that serve approximately 3.4 million subscribers; and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership ("TWE-A/N") which own cable systems that serve approximately 4.7 million subscribers.4 Each of TWCL, TWNY, TWE, and TWE-A/N is a direct or indirect subsidiary of TWC.5 The four subsidiaries have owned cable systems that provided, and continue to own cable systems that provide, services to residents of Texas and elsewhere that Rembrandt contends infringed and continue to infringe the patents-in-suit. 3. Based on TWC's public statements, Rembrandt seeks to add the four subsidiaries,

TWCL, TWNY, TWE, and TWE-A/N, as defendants to ensure that Rembrandt has the proper parties before the Court in order to reach all of TWC's cable operations during the infringing period. 4. Rembrandt seeks leave to amend, pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Granting Rembrandt leave to add the four

Civil Procedure, because TWC has answered.

Warner's cable interests, including those wholly owned and those that were held through Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., are now controlled by TWC).
3

December 7, 2006 Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement of Time Warner Cable, Inc. at 1, attached as exhibit 4 to the declaration of Brooke A. M. Taylor.
4

Id. at 5. Id. at Exhibit 21.1.

5

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-19 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 16

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 6 Page 3 of 6

subsidiaries will not prejudice either TWC or the four subsidiaries. The case is not yet set for a scheduling conference. Moreover, at the scheduling conference or shortly thereafter, the Court enters a Docket Control Order which typically grants the parties a certain period of time in which to add additional parties without the need to seek leave of this Court. Rembrandt is seeking to add the four subsidiaries before the time for freely adding parties has commenced. Rembrandt moves for leave of this Court to file the amended complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to add Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner NY Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership as named defendants. DATED: February 23, 2007 Respectfully submitted, /s/_Brooke A. M. Taylor ______________ Max L. Tribble, Jr. Lead Attorney State Bar No. 20213950 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002-5096 Telephone: (713) 651-9366 Fax: (713) 654-6666 E-mail: [email protected] Brooke A.M. Taylor State Bar No. 33190 (Washington) E-mail: [email protected] Edgar Sargent State Bar No. 28283 (Washington) E-mail: [email protected] Matthew R. Berry State Bar No. 37364 (Washington) E-mail: [email protected] SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 Telephone: (206) 516-3880 Fax: (206) 516-3883

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-19 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 16

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 6 Page 4 of 6

Tibor L. Nagy State Bar No. 24041562 E-mail: [email protected] SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 590 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022-8521 Telephone: (212) 336-8330 Fax: (212) 516-3883

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-19 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 16

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 6 Page 5 of 6

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Counsel for plaintiff has conferred with counsel for defendant on February 23, 2007, and counsel for defendant was unable to respond as to the disposition of the matters raised in this motion.

/s/ Brooke A. M. Taylor Brooke A. M. Taylor

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-19 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 16

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 6 of 6 Page 6 of 6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 23, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the clerk of the court for the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, using the electronic filing system of the court. The electronic case filing system sent a "Notice of Electronic Filing" to the following attorneys of record who have consented in writing to accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic means: /s/ Brooke A. M. Taylor Brooke A. M. Taylor

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-20 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 17

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendant, § § § § § § § § §

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv00369-TJW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON REMBRANDT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND This Court, having considered the pleadings, hereby GRANTS Rembrandt's Motion for Leave to Amend to add additional entities to the instant action.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this ____ day of February, 2007.

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 9 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TIME WARNER CABLE INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

Case No. 2:06-CV-369 TJW JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Rembrandt") files this complaint for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,008,903; 5,710,761; 5,778,234; 6,131,159 and 6,950,444 under 35 U.S.C. § 271, and in support thereof would respectfully show the Court the following: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Rembrandt is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the state

of New Jersey with its principal place of business at 401 City Avenue, Suite 815, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 and offices at 214 W. Fanin, Marshall, TX 75670. 2. Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. ("TWC") is a corporation organized under the

laws of the state of Delaware with its principal place of business at 7910 Crescent Executive Drive, Suite 56, Charlotte, North Carolina 28217. TWC's registered agent for service of process in Texas is CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Dallas, Texas 75201. TWC is a national provider of cable television and internet products and services, and regularly conducts and transacts business in Texas and within this judicial district itself (both as Time Warner Cable and/or Road Runner).

1

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 9 Page 2 of 9

3.

Defendant Time Warner Cable LLC ("TWCL"), is a corporation organized under

the laws of the state of Delaware with its principal place of business at 290 Harbor Drive, Stamford, CT 06902. TWCL's registered agent for service of process is the Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 4. Defendant Time Warner New York Cable LLC ("TWNY") is a corporation

organized under the laws of the state of Delaware with its principal place of business at 7910 Crescent Executive Drive, Suite 56, Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-5511. TWNY's registered agent for service of process in Texas is CT Corporation System at 350 North St. Paul Street, Dallas, Texas 75201. 5. Defendant Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. ("TWE") is a limited

partnership organized under the laws of the state of Delaware with its principal place of business at 290 Harbor Drive, Stamford, Connecticut 06902 in care of Time Warner Cable. TWE's registered agent for service of process in Texas is CT Corporation Systems at 1021 Main Street, Suite 1150, Houston, Texas 77002. 6. Defendant Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership

("TWEAN") is a partnership organized under the laws of the state of New York with its principal place of business at 7910 Crescent Executive Drive, Suite 56, Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 in care of TWEAN Texas Cable Partners General Partner LLC. TWEAN's registered agent for service of process in Texas is CT Corporation System at 350 North St. Paul Street, Dallas, Texas 75201. 7. TWC is the direct or indirect parent of each of TWCL, TWNY, TWE, and

TWEAN. Through one or more of its subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, or other related parties, TWC owns and/or operates cable systems throughout the United States and in the State of Texas

2

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 9 Page 3 of 9

(as Time Warner Cable and/or Road Runner). TWCL, TWNY, TWE, and TWEAN, each directly or through one or more subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, or other related parties own and operate cable systems in Texas and elsewhere. TWC, TWCL, TWNY, TWE, and TWEAN (collectively, the "Defendants"), directly or through one or more subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, or other related parties, as set forth herein, have each committed and continue to commit tortious acts of patent infringement within and outside of Texas and within this judicial district. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. This is an action for patent infringement, arising under the patent laws of the

United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. This Court has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1338(a). 9. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants TWC, TWCL, TWNY,

TWE, and TWEAN. Defendants have conducted and continue to conduct business in the State of Texas. Defendants directly or through subsidiaries or intermediaries, offer for sale, sell, advertise, and market products and services that infringe the patents-in-suit as described more specifically below. Therefore, because Defendants have committed acts of patent infringement in this district, or are otherwise present or doing business in this district, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. 10. 1400(b). COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,008,903 11. above. Rembrandt refers to and incorporates herein the allegations of Paragraphs 1-10 Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§1391(b), (c), and

3

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 9 Page 4 of 9

12.

Rembrandt is the owner of all right, title and interest, including the right to sue,

enforce and recover damages for all infringements, in U.S. Patent No. 5,008,903, entitled "Adaptive Transmit Pre-Emphasis for Digital Modem Computed from Noise Spectrum" ("the `903 patent"). A true copy of the `903 patent is attached as Exhibit A. 13. The `903 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and

Trademark Office on April 16, 1991, after full and fair examination. 14. Defendants have directly or indirectly infringed, and are continuing to directly or

indirectly infringe, the `903 patent by practicing or causing others to practice, by inducement and contributorily, the inventions claimed in the `903 patent, in this district or otherwise within the United States. For example, Defendants have infringed and continues to infringe the `903 patent by providing high-speed cable modem internet products and services to subscribers. 15. Upon information and belief, Defendants will continue to infringe the `903 patent

unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, such infringement has been, and will continue to be, willful, making this an exceptional case and entitling Rembrandt to increased damages and reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285. COUNT II: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,710,761 16. above. 17. Rembrandt is the owner of all right, title and interest, including the right to sue, Rembrandt refers to and incorporates herein the allegations of Paragraphs 1-10

enforce and recover damages for all infringements, in U.S. Patent No. 5,710,761, entitled "Error Control Negotiation Based on Modulation" ("the `761 patent"). A true copy of the `761 patent is attached as Exhibit B.

4

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 9 Page 5 of 9

18.

The `761 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and

Trademark Office on January 20, 1998, after full and fair examination. 19. Defendants have directly or indirectly infringed, and are continuing to directly or

indirectly infringe, the `761 patent by practicing or causing others to practice, by inducement and contributorily, the inventions claimed in the `761 patent, in this district or otherwise within the United States. For example, Defendants have infringed and continues to infringe the `761 patent by providing high-speed cable modem internet products and services to subscribers. 20. Upon information and belief, Defendants will continue to infringe the `761 patent

unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, such infringement has been, and will continue to be, willful, making this an exceptional case and entitling Rembrandt to increased damages and reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285. COUNT III: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,778,234 21. above. 22. Rembrandt is the owner of all right, title and interest, including the right to sue, Rembrandt refers to and incorporates herein the allegations of Paragraphs 1-10

enforce and recover damages for all infringements, in U.S. Patent No. 5,778,234, entitled "Method for Downloading Programs" ("the `234 patent."). A true copy of the `234 patent is attached as Exhibit C. 23. The `234 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and

Trademark Office on July 7, 1998, after full and fair examination. 24. Defendants have directly or indirectly infringed, and are continuing to directly or

indirectly infringe, the `234 patent by practicing or causing others to practice, by inducement and contributorily, the inventions claimed in the `234 patent, in this district or otherwise within the

5

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 6 of 9 Page 6 of 9

United States. For example, Defendants have infringed and continues to infringe the `234 patent by providing high-speed cable modem internet products and services to subscribers. 25. Upon information and belief, Defendants will continue to infringe the `234 patent

unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, such infringement has been, and will continue to be, willful, making this an exceptional case and entitling Rembrandt to increased damages and reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285. COUNT IV: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,131,159 26. above. 27. Rembrandt is the owner of all right, title and interest, including the right to sue, Rembrandt refers to and incorporates herein the allegations of Paragraphs 1-10

enforce and recover damages for all infringements, in U.S. Patent No. 6,131,159, entitled "System for Downloading Programs" ("the `159 patent."). A true copy of the `159 patent is attached as Exhibit D. 28. The `159 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and

Trademark Office on October 10, 2000, after full and fair examination. 29. Defendants have directly or indirectly infringed, and are continuing to directly or

indirectly infringe, the `159 patent by practicing or causing others to practice, by inducement and contributorily, the inventions claimed in the `159 patent, in this district or otherwise within the United States. For example, Defendants has infringed and continues to infringe the `159 patent by providing high-speed cable modem internet products and services to subscribers. 30. Upon information and belief, Defendants will continue to infringe the `159 patent

unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, such infringement has been, and will

6

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 7 of 9 Page 7 of 9

continue to be, willful, making this an exceptional case and entitling Rembrandt to increased damages and reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285.

COUNT V: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,950,444 31. above. 32. Rembrandt is the owner of all right, title and interest, including the right to sue, Rembrandt refers to and incorporates herein the allegations of Paragraphs 1-10

enforce and recover damages for all infringements, in U.S. Patent No. 6,950,444, entitled "System and Method for a Robust Preamble and Transmission Delimiting in a Switched-Carrier Transceiver" ("the `444 patent"). A true copy of the `444 patent is attached as Exhibit E. 33. The `444 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and

Trademark Office on September 27, 2005, after full and fair examination. 34. Defendants have directly or indirectly infringed, and are continuing to directly or

indirectly infringe, the `444 patent by practicing or causing others to practice, by inducement and contributorily, the inventions claimed in the `444 patent, in this district or otherwise within the United States. For example, Defendants have infringed and continues to infringe the `444 patent by providing high-speed cable modem internet products and services to subscribers. 35. Upon information and belief, Defendants will continue to infringe the `444 patent

unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, such infringement has been, and will continue to be, willful, making this an exceptional case and entitling Rembrandt to increased damages and reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285.

7

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 8 of 9 Page 8 of 9

PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Rembrandt prays that it have judgment against Defendants TWC, TWCL, TWNY, TWE and TWEAN for the following: (1) patents-in-suit; (2) A permanent injunction enjoining and restraining TWC, TWCL, TWNY, TWE An order that TWC, TWCL, TWNY, TWE and TWEAN have infringed the

and TWEAN and their agents, servants, employees, affiliates, divisions, and subsidiaries, and those in association therewith, from making, using, offering to sell, selling, and importing into the United States any product, or using, offering to sell, or selling any service, which falls within the scope of any claim of the patents-in-suit; (3) (4) (5) (6) entitled. JURY DEMAND Rembrandt hereby demands a jury trial on all issues appropriately triable by a jury. Dated: February __, 2007. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Brooke A. M. Taylor____________________ Max L. Tribble, Jr. Lead Attorney State Bar No. 20213950 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 8 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. An award of damages; An award of increased damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284; An award of all costs of this action, including attorneys' fees and interest; and Such other and further relief, at law or in equity, to which Rembrandt is justly

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-21 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 18

Filed 02/23/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 9 of 9 Page 9 of 9

Houston, Texas 77002-5096 Telephone: (713) 651-9366 Fax: (713) 654-6666 E-mail: [email protected] Brooke A.M. Taylor State Bar No. 33190 (Washington) E-mail: [email protected] Edgar Sargent State Bar No. 28283 (Washington) E-mail: [email protected] Matthew R. Berry State Bar No. 37364 (Washington) E-mail: [email protected] SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 Telephone: (206) 516-3880 Fax: (206) 516-3883 Tibor L. Nagy State Bar No. 24041562 E-mail: [email protected] SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 590 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022-8521 Telephone: (212) 336-8330 Fax: (212) 516-3883

9

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 10 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 10 Page 2 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 10 Page 3 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 10 Page 4 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 5 of 10 Page 5 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 6 of 10 Page 6 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 7 of 10 Page 7 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 8 of 10 Page 8 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 9 of 10 Page 9 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-22 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 10 of 10 Page 10 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-23 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 7 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-23 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 7 Page 2 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-23 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 7 Page 3 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-23 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 7 Page 4 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-23 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 5 of 7 Page 5 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-23 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 6 of 7 Page 6 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-23 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 7 of 7 Page 7 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-24 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 7 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-24 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 7 Page 2 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-24 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 7 Page 3 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-24 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 7 Page 4 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-24 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 5 of 7 Page 5 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-24 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 6 of 7 Page 6 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-24 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 7 of 7 Page 7 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-25 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 7 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-25 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 7 Page 2 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-25 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 7 Page 3 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-25 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 7 Page 4 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-25 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 5 of 7 Page 5 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-25 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 6 of 7 Page 6 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-25 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 7 of 7 Page 7 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 24 Page 1 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 24 Page 2 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 24 Page 3 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 24 Page 4 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 5 of 24 Page 5 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 6 of 24 Page 6 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 7 of 24 Page 7 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 8 of 24 Page 8 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 9 of 24 Page 9 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 10 of 24 Page 10 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 11 of 24 Page 11 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 12 of 24 Page 12 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 13 of 24 Page 13 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 14 of 24 Page 14 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 15 of 24 Page 15 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 16 of 24 Page 16 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 17 of 24 Page 17 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 18 of 24 Page 18 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 19 of 24 Page 19 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 20 of 24 Page 20 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 21 of 24 Page 21 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 22 of 24 Page 22 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 23 of 24 Page 23 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-26 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 19-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 24 of 24 Page 24 of 24

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-27 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-27 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-27 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-28 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-28 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-28 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-29 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 7 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-29 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 7 Page 2 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-29 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 7 Page 3 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-29 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 7 Page 4 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-29 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 5 of 7 Page 5 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-29 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 6 of 7 Page 6 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-29 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-3

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 7 of 7 Page 7 of 7

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-30 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-30 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-30 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-30 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-4

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 12 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 12 Page 2 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 12 Page 3 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 12 Page 4 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 5 of 12 Page 5 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 6 of 12 Page 6 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 7 of 12 Page 7 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 8 of 12 Page 8 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 9 of 12 Page 9 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 10 of 12 Page 10 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 11 of 12 Page 11 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 57-31 Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 20-5

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 02/23/2007

Page 12 of 12 Page 12 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00402-GMS Document 57-32 Case 2:06-cv-00369-TJW-CE Document 21
O AO 456 (Rev. 5/85) Notice

Filed 03/08/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 2 Pa