Free Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00399-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00047-TJW-CE Document 48 Document 14 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 1 of 4 Filed 04/11/2006 Page of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP Plaintiff, vs. § § § § § § § § § § § § §

Case No: 2:06-cv-00047 TJW JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP. Defendants.

PLAINTIFF REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES LP'S REPLY TO SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP.'S COUNTERCLAIM Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP, ("Rembrandt") files this reply to Defendant Sharp Electronics Corp.'s ("SEC") Counterclaim, filed March 29, 2006, and states as follows: PARTIES 1. 2. Rembrandt admits the allegations of Counterclaim paragraph 1. Rembrandt admits the allegations of Counterclaim paragraph 2. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. Rembrandt admits that SEC purports to allege a Counterclaim arising under 28

U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a), 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. Rembrandt does not need to respond to SEC's conclusion as to this Court's subject matter jurisdiction over SEC's Counterclaim. Rembrandt denies that SEC is entitled to any declaratory relief. 4. Rembrandt admits that it commenced a civil action for infringement of the `627

Patent by filing a Complaint in this Court against, inter alia, SEC on or about February 3, 2006. Rembrandt admits there is an actual controversy between SEC and Rembrandt with respect to 1
Dallas 217066v1

Case 1:07-cv-00399-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00047-TJW-CE Document 48 Document 14 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 2 of 4 Filed 04/11/2006 Page of 4

SEC's infringement of the `627 Patent and the validity of the `627 Patent. Rembrandt denies the remaining allegations of Counterclaim paragraph 4. 5. 6. Counterclaim. COUNT 1 7. Rembrandt repeats and re-alleges its answers to Counterclaim Paragraphs 1-6 Rembrandt admits that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Rembrandt. Rembrandt admits that this judicial district is a proper venue for SEC's

above as if fully restated herein. 8. Rembrandt denies the allegations of Counterclaim paragraph 8. COUNT 2 9. Rembrandt repeats and re-alleges its answers to Counterclaim Paragraphs 1-8

above as if fully restated herein. 10. Rembrandt denies the allegations of Counterclaim paragraph 10.

Rembrandt denies each and every allegation contained in SEC's Counterclaim that is not expressly admitted herein. Rembrandt denies that SEC is entitled to the relief requested or any other relief. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Rembrandt prays for the following relief: A. B. C. D. The dismissal of SEC's Counterclaims for declaratory relief; Judgment declaring that SEC infringes the `627 patent; Judgment declaring that the `627 patent is valid and enforceable; An award of Rembrandt's attorney's fees and costs, together with pre-judgment

and post-judgment interest in the maximum amount provided by law; and E. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable. 2
Dallas 217066v1

Case 1:07-cv-00399-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00047-TJW-CE Document 48 Document 14 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 3 of 4 Filed 04/11/2006 Page of 4

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Rembrandt hereby demands a jury trial on all issues appropriately triable by a jury. DATED: April 11, 2006 Respectfully submitted, McKOOL SMITH, P.C. _/s/ D. Cawley (w/p D. Sochia)__________ DOUGLAS A. CAWLEY Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 04035500 [email protected] 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 SAMUEL F. BAXTER Texas State Bar No. 01938000 [email protected] DAVID SOCHIA Texas State Bar No. 00797470 [email protected] BRADLEY W. CALDWELL Texas State Bar No. 24040630 [email protected] 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 PARKER & BUNT ROBERT M. PARKER State Bar No. 15498000 [email protected] ROBERT CHRISTOPHER BUNT State Bar No. 00787165 [email protected] 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 531-3535 Telecopier: (903) 533-9687 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP 3
Dallas 217066v1

Case 1:07-cv-00399-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00047-TJW-CE Document 48 Document 14 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 4 4 of 4 Filed 04/11/2006 Page of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by U.S. mail on this the 11th day of April, 2006.

__/s/ David Sochia______________ David Sochia

4
Dallas 217066v1