Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 26.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 288 Words, 1,726 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/21263/274.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Arizona ( 26.2 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States of America, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 The court has before it "Robert Johnson's and Groupe Angelil International Holdings 18 S.A.'s Rule 54(b) Motion for Certification of Judgment and Rule 58(d) Motion for Entry of 19 Separate Judgment" (doc. 268), the government's "Preliminary Response" (doc. 269), and 20 "Robert Johnson's and Groupe Angelil's Reply" (doc. 270). 21 The motion asks us to reformat our order of December 18, 2007, purportedly pursuant 22 to Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ.P., and Rule 54(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 If these rules even apply to orders entered under Rule 32.2(c), Fed. R. Crim. P., Rule 24 54(b) certification would be unnecessary because there are no unresolved claims in this case. 25 And, to the extent that Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P., requires a separate document, our order 26 constitutes that document and the proposed order adds nothing to it. 27 28
Case 2:02-cr-00993-FJM Document 274 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CR 02-993-PHX-FJM ORDER

vs. Kwikmed. Inc.; Cymedic Health Group, Inc., Keith B. Salvato; Ronald N. Wanchuk; Janice G. Gamblin; William J. Clemans; Adalberto Robles, Defendants.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

At all events, Robert Johnson and Groupe Angelil have now filed a notice of appeal from our order and thus we believe their motion is now moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED DENYING Robert Johnson's and Groupe Angelil's Rule 54(b) motion and Rule 58(d) motion on grounds of mootness (doc 268). DATED this 4th day of March, 2008.

-2Case 2:02-cr-00993-FJM Document 274 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 2 of 2