Free Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 16.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: April 15, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 294 Words, 1,828 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38605/58.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Delaware ( 16.8 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07—cv—00438-JJF Document 58 Filed 04/15/2008 Page1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
SEPRACOR INC., :
Plaintiff, ;
v. E C.A. No. 07-438 JJF
BARR LABORATORIES, INC., E
Defendant. Z
ORDER
On December 7, 2007, Defendant Barr Laboratories (“Barr”)
informed the Court by letter that it and Plaintiff Sepracor, Inc.
(“Sepracor") are at an impasse over the content of the proposed
Scheduling and Protective Orders. On January I0, 2008, Defendant
filed a Motion for Entry of Scheduling and Protective Orders
(D.I. 34), which addresses the same matter as its December
letter.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion
(D.I. 34) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
A. the Scheduling Order shall include a limitation of
fifty (50) hours, for each side, of taking non-expert
testimony by deposition.
B. the Protective Order shall include the provisions
stipulated to in Defendant’s December 7, 2007 letter,
with the following changes:
I. Sections 2(f)(i) & (ii) on pages 3-4, the Court
adopts Barr’s proposals;

E Case1:07—cv-00438-JJF Document 58 Filed 04/15/2008 Page20f2
2. Section 3 on page 5, the language Barr further
proposes is omitted;
3. Section ll(a) on page 7, Barr's proposals are
omitted;
4. Section l6 on page 9, the language Sepracor
further proposes is omitted;
5. Section l8 on page 9, Barr's proposal is omitted,
and for section l8(a) on page l0, Sepracor's
proposal is adopted;
6. Section 25 on page l4, the language Barr further
proposes is omitted;
7. The parties shall jointly resubmit a Stipulated
Protective Order that is in accordance with the
Court’s ruling;
/ A (i>Vn
April LiL, 2008 _§§2§§?¥2;§___f§f[§g%§T________
UN TED ST ES DISTR JUDGE