Free Consent to Magistrate Judge Disposition on Motion - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cv—0O537-SLR-LPS Document 27 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv—OO537-***-LPS Document 26 Filed O1/O8/2008 Page 1 of 1
QAO SSA (Rev. 8/9S! Consent to Exercise ofJurisdiction by a United States Judge Ovcr Sgcitic Motiongsg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF Delaware
Phoenix Payment Systems, Inc. d/b/a
Electronic Payment Exchange , CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION
Plaintiff BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
V. OVER DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DESCRIBED
Lexcel, Inc. and Lexcel Solutions , Inc. , UNDER 28 U.S.C.§636(b)(l)(B)
Defendant
CASE NUMBER: 07-537 (***)
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION
In accordance with the provisions of`28 U.S.C.§636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, the parties in this case consent to have
a United States magistratejudge conduct any and all proceedings and enter a final order as to each motion identified below.
MOTION(S): Plaintiff Phoenix Payment Systems '
Motion to Dismiss Lexcel ' s Counterclaim (D . I . 12)
Pay Represented Signatures Date
Phoenix Payment Systems, Inc. /s/ Julia Heaney (#3052) 1/8/08
LeX°el* me and /s/ Chad s.c. sewer (#4919) 1/8/08
.....
ORDER OF REFERENCE
IT IS ORDERED that the above motion(s) be referred to LeOnaId P · Stafk ,
United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct all proceedings and enter a final order on such motion(s) in accordance with
28 U.S.C.§636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P.73.
I f [ O Z U V f
Date f ited States District Jud
NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED ON THIS
FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Case 1:07-cv-00537-SLR-LPS

Document 27

Filed 01/10/2008

Page 1 of 1