Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

E 1 T Case 1 :07-cr-00126-JJF Document 9 Filed O9/13/2007 Page 1 of 2 · , _
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Q
F OR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE _~’
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1
Plaintiff, U
v. Criminal Action No. 07- ’ .
JALAL ALIAHMED, I our c »-——\ —-l Pu. .
a/Ida Galal Aliahmed, :
T Lil tj I? _ J!
Defendant. : `“
INDICTMENT
The Grand Jury for the District of Delaware charges that:
COUNT I
On or about August 28, 2007, in the District of Delaware, J ALAL ALIAHMED, a/k/a
Gala] Aliahmed, defendant herein, did knowingly possess with intent to distribute a mixture and
substance containing a detectable amount of marijuana, a controlled substance, in violation of 21
U.S.C. § 84I(a)(l) and (b)(l)(D).
COUNT II
l On or about August 28, 2007, in the District of Delaware, JALAL ALIAHIVIED, a/k/a i I l
Galal Alialnned, defendant herein, did knowingly escape from custody of an officer ofthe United
States, to wit an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, wherein he was held by virtue of
his lawful arrest for a felony offense, to wit, Title 2I United States Code, Section 841 (a)(1), all in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 75I(a).
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE ‘
Upon conviction of the controlled substance offense alleged in Count I of this Indictment,
JALAL ALIAHMED, afk/a Galal Aliahmed, defendant herein, shall forfeit to the United States

_ Case 1 :07-cr—00126—JJF Document 9 Filed O9/13/2007 Page 2 of 2 ., ,
_ '* » Q · I ( I K F N
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853, any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained,
directly or indirectly, as a result of the said violation and any property used, or intended to be
used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission ofthe said violation.
lf any of the above—described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendant:
(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
_(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or
(e) has been cornmingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty;
it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to 2l U.S.C. § 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other
property of said defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property described above.
A TRUE RTI r :-
' Foreperson
COLM F. CONNOLLY
United States Attorney
Dssslri; ,,,M¢€am*· t Q i ‘ l
Assisraiir tJniied“stare$ Attorney ‘ i__· ,
ggqynymhu *¤h»rJ“'%?Mvjrw“
Dated: September I3, 2007
“W“&'A¤°% ¢*¤¤·¤*¤¤»··=¤Mnwwmw¤¤w=·-m»·»¤·¤
J
*""’““'*¤· —u•nm¤»:»¤r¤»¤·.w~»
_

Case 1:07-cr-00126-JJF

Document 9

Filed 09/13/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cr-00126-JJF

Document 9

Filed 09/13/2007

Page 2 of 2