Free Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 107.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 329 Words, 2,213 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38962/26.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware ( 107.6 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00601-GMS-LPS

Document 26

Filed 01/21/2008

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

HEIDELBERG USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. SCREENTONE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ACACIA PATENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION, ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION, and PAUL S. SNYPP, Defendants. KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff, v. SCREENTONE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ACACIA PATENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION, ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION, and PAUL S. SNYPP, Defendants.

Civ. No. 07-601-GMS-LPS

Civ. No. 07-602-GMS-LPS

UNOPPOSED ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS On this _____ day of ________________, 2008, the Court having considered the parties' agreement to stay all proceedings until the time that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation rules on the pending motion filed by Canon U.S.A., Inc., Eastman Kodak Company, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Ricoh Americas Corporation, Kyocera Mita America, Inc. and Konica Minolta Business Solutions, Inc. in In re: Halftone Color Separations (`809) Patent Litigation, MDL No. 1926 and finding

1

Case 1:07-cv-00601-GMS-LPS

Document 26

Filed 01/21/2008

Page 2 of 2

that good cause exists for the granting of the same, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: All proceedings in the above-captioned actions are stayed pending receipt by the Court of the decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in In re: Halftone Color Separations (`809) Patent Litigation, MDL No. 1926. Counsel for Konica Minolta Business Solutions, Inc. shall provide to the Court a copy of the decision of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation within ten (10) days of the date of issuance. If the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation does not order transfer of the above-captioned actions, then this stay shall terminate, and the Court shall thereafter consider the Defendants' Motion to Stay or Transfer Pending Resolution of Issues by the Eastern District of Texas, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 16).

______________________________________ THE HONORABLE LEONARD P. STARK

2

Case 1:07-cv-00601-GMS-LPS

Document 26-2

Filed 01/21/2008

Page 1 of 1