Free Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 20.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: April 11, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 404 Words, 2,510 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38966/35.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Delaware ( 20.3 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :07—cv—00605-JJF Document 35 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
)
AMERICAN PATENT DEVELOPMENT )
CORPORATION, LLC, )
)
Plaintiff )
) Civil Action No. 07-605-JJF
v. )
)
MOVIELINK, LLC, )
)
Defendant. )
)
CONSENT ORDER
The parties, plaintiff American Patent Development Corporation, LLC ("APDC") and
defendant, Movielink, LLC ("Movielink"), having agreed to the resolution of the Motion to
Compel Discovery filed on March I4, 2008; it is therefore ORDERED as follows:
I. APDC's Motion is granted in part with respect to APDC's document request Nos.
7, l2 and I3. Movielink shall produce non-privileged documents reflecting the structure,
architecture, operation, and functionality of its systems for providing a video product to a user
site electronically, where the user's access to the video product is denied when the limit for
authorized viewing of the video product is reached. To the extent they have not already been
produced, such documents able to be located by a reasonable search shall be produced within l0
business days; other such documents shall be produced within I0 business days after completion
of Movielink's search of electronic documents using specific terms previously agreed to by the
parties, and this search shall be completed within 5 business days.
2. With respect to APDC's request No. 43, which seeks the production of 37 specific
pleadings filed under seal in USA Video Technology Corp. v. Movielink, LLC, Civil Action No.

Case 1:07—cv—00605-JJF Document 35 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
1:03-CV-00368-KAJ which was previously pending in this Court, the Court finds that (i) APDC
requested USA Video Technology Corporation to consent to such production through letters
dated March 4 and March 10, 2008 (Exhibits J and K to the Motion), but USA Video
Technology Corporation did not respond to such letters; (ii) APDC provided USA Video
Technology Corporation with a copy of the Motion on March 25, 2008 (Exhibit L to the
Motion), but USA Video Technology Corporation did not respond; (iii) Movielink does not
oppose such production; therefore, Movielink shall produce the 37 pleadings sought by APDC
pursuant to its request No. 43 within l0 days of this Order.
SO ORDERED:
A, l L OS
Date JOSEPH J. FARNAN,JJnited States District Judge
INC ·
-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00605-JJF

Document 35

Filed 04/11/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00605-JJF

Document 35

Filed 04/11/2008

Page 2 of 2