Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00640-GMS-MPT

Document 101

Filed 07/31/2008

Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORP,. Plaintiff, )
) )

C.A. No. 07-640-GMS/MPT

v.
GREAT NORTHERN INS. CO., Defendant.

)
)

) ) )

SCHEDULING ORDER

This 3!4Jtday of July, 2008, the Court having conducted an initial Rule 16 scheduling and planning conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(a) on July 29, 2008, and the parties having determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement, voluntary mediation, or binding arbitration; IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and E-Discovery Default Standard.

Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the parties shall make their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) within five days of the date of this Order. If they have not already done so, the parties are to review the

Court's Default Standard for Discovery of Electronic Documents, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Orders, etc., Policies & Procedures, Ad Hoc Committee for Electronic Discovery), and is incorporated herein by reference. 2. Joinder of other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to

join other parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings shall be filed on or before September 26,2008.

RLFI-3307409-1

Case 1:07-cv-00640-GMS-MPT

Document 101

Filed 07/31/2008

Page 2 of 6

3.

Discovery. a. Limitation on Hours for Deposition Discovery. Each side is limited

to a total of 25 hours of taking testimony by deposition upon oral examination. b. Location of Depositions. Any party or representative (officer,

director, or managing agent) of a party filing a civil action in this district court must ordinarily be required, upon request, to submit to a deposition at a place designated within this district. Exceptions to this general rule may be made by order of the Court. A defendant who becomes a counterclaimant, cross-claimant, or third-party plaintiff shall be considered as having filed an action in this Court for the purpose of this provision. c. Discovery Cut Off. All discovery in this case shall be initiated so

that it will be completed on or before November 28, 2008. The Court encourages the parties to serve and respond to contention interrogatories early in the case. Unless

otherwise ordered by the Court, the limitations on discovery set forth in Local Rule 26.1 shall be strictly observed. d. Disclosure of Expert Testimony. For the party who has the initial

burden of proof on the subject matter, the initial Federal Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert testimony is due on or before December 22, 2008. The supplemental disclosure to contradict or rebut evidence on the same matter identified by another party is due on or before January 22, 2009. Along with the submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall advise of the dates and times of their experts' availability for deposition. To the extent any objection to expert testimony is made pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. , Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it shall be made by motion no later than the

2
RLF 1-3307409-1

Case 1:07-cv-00640-GMS-MPT

Document 101

Filed 07/31/2008

Page 3 of 6

deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. e. Discovery Matters. Should counsel find they are unable to resolve

a discovery matter, the parties involved in the discovery matter(s) shall contact chambers at (302) 573-6173 to schedule a telephone conference. Not less than forty-eight (48) hours prior to the conference, excluding weekends and holidays, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. (The Court does not seek extensive argument or authorities at this point; it seeks simply a statement of the issue to be addressed and a summary of the basis for the party's position on the issue.) Not less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the conference, excluding weekends and holidays, any party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, outlining that party's reason for its opposition. Should any document(s) be filed under seal, a copy of the sealed document(s) must be provided to the Magistrate Judge within one (1) hour of e-filing the document(s). Should the Court find further briefing

necessary upon conclusion of the telephone conference, the Court will order it. Disputes over protective orders or motions for extension of time for briefing case dispositive motions which are related to discovery matters are to be addressed in the first instance in accordance with this paragraph. 4. Application to Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find it

will be necessary to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the disclosure of confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order and submit it to the Court within ten days from the date of this Order. Should counsel be unable to reach an

3
RLFI-3307409-1

Case 1:07-cv-00640-GMS-MPT

Document 101

Filed 07/31/2008

Page 4 of 6

agreement on a proposed form of order, the counsel must first follow the provisions of Paragraph 3e above. Any proposed order should include the following paragraph: Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the disclosure of information in this case, the Court does not intend to preclude another court from finding that information may be relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or party subject to this order who becomes subject to a motion to disclose another party's information designated "confidential" pursuant to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion so that the party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard on whether that information should be disclosed. 5. Papers Filed Under Seal. When filing papers under seal, counsel should

deliver to the Clerk an original and one copy of the papers. 6. conference. 7. Interim Status Report. On October 24, 2008, counsel shall submit a joint ADR Process. To be discussed during the Rule 16 scheduling

interim report to the Court on the nature of the matters in issue and the progress of discovery to date. 8. Status Conference. On October 28, 2008, the Court will hold a Rule 16(a), Plaintiffs

(b) and (c) conference by telephone with counsel beginning at 9:30 a.m.

counsel shall initiate the telephone call. At the time of this conference, counsel shall also be prepared to discuss the progress, if any, of settlement discussions and shall be prepared to discuss the possibility of setting up a settlement conference with the Court, counsel and their clients. If all parties agree that there is nothing to report, nor

anything to add to the interim status report or to this order, they shall notify the Court in

4
RLF 1-3307409-1

Case 1:07-cv-00640-GMS-MPT

Document 101

Filed 07/31/2008

Page 5 of 6

writing before the conference is scheduled to occur, and the conference will be taken off the Court's calendar. 9. Case Dispositive Motions. All case dispositive motions, an opening brief,

and affidavits, if any, in support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before February 27,2009. Briefing will be presented pursuant to the Court's Local Rules. 10. Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any application

to the Court shall be by written motion filed with the Clerk. Unless otherwise requested by the Court, counsel shall not deliver copies of papers or correspondence to Chambers. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement required by Local Rule 7.1.1. 11. Pretrial Conference. On August 11, 2009, the Court will hold a Final Unless

Pretrial Conference in Chambers with counsel beginning at 5:30 p.m.

otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties should assume that filing the pretrial order satisfies the pretrial disclosure requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall file with the Court the joint proposed final pretrial order with the information required by the form of Final Pretrial Order which accompanies this Scheduling Order at a time to be determined by the Court. Ii d", t!:.4-':I'''' .r.,:Jn.~q~,.", I.P k. 4-y~ ~ ~'7~~1H~ n.-d"- h fJe..tleku.u""n4t ~4hr 12. Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in limine requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each party shall be limited to five in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in
limine request may be supported by a maximum of three pages of argument and may

J~t (A- tfJ,t4~ ~~ ~~.6,- ~~

~~.

be opposed by a maximum of three pages of argument.

If more than one party is

supporting or opposing an in limine request, such support or opposition shall be

5
RLFI-3307409-1

Case 1:07-cv-00640-GMS-MPT

Document 101

Filed 07/31/2008

Page 6 of 6

combined in a single three (3) page submission, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. 13. Jury Instructions. Voir Dire. and Special Verdict Forms. Where a case is

to be tried to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47 and 51 the parties should file proposed voir dire, instructions to the jury, and special verdict forms and jury interrogatories three full business days before the final pretrial conference. That submission shall be

accompanied by a computer diskette (in WordPerfect format) which contains the instructions, proposed voir dire, special verdict forms, and jury interrogatories. 14. Trial. The length and date of trial will be determined at a later date.

6
RLFI-3307409-1