Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 29.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 351 Words, 2,240 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39063/9.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware ( 29.9 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00649-JJF-LPS

Document 9

Filed 11/15/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CITICORP CREDIT SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. LPL LICENSING, LLC, and PHOENIX LICENSING, L.L.C., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 07-649-JJF (LPS)

CONSOLIDATED MOTIONS TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS LPL LICENSING, L.L.C. AND PHOENIX LICENSING, L.L.C. Defendants LPL Licensing, L.L.C. ("LPL") and Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. ("Phoenix") move to dismiss this action. Specifically, defendants move as follows: First, they move to dismiss under the first-to-file rule because Citicorp's claims were filed after the a previously filed action in the Eastern District of Texas, involving the same parties and the same issues, and allowing these claims to continue would waste time, effort, and money. Second, they move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Citicorp cannot identify the requisite "actual controversy" between the parties. Third, they ask the Court to exercise its discretion to decline to hear Citicorp's declaratory judgment claims because this case falls outside the purposes of the Declaratory Judgment Act, and dismissal will allow the most efficient resolution of all the disputes between parties in one court: the Eastern District of Texas. Fourth, defendant Phoenix moves to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction because this District has no general or specific jurisdiction over Phoenix.

675751-1

Case 1:07-cv-00649-JJF-LPS

Document 9

Filed 11/15/2007

Page 2 of 2

The grounds for this motion are set forth more specifically in LPL's and Phoenix's Opening Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed contemporaneously herewith.

November 15, 2007

THE BAYARD FIRM /s/ Richard D. Kirk (rk0922) Richard D. Kirk (rk0922) 222 Delaware Avenue, Suit 900 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-5130 [email protected] (3020) 655-5000 Attorneys for Defendants, LPL LICENSING, L.L.C. and PHOENIX LICENSING, L.L.C.

OF COUNSEL: Gregory Dovel Sean Luner Dovel & Luner LLP 201 Santa Monica, Suite 600 Santa Monica California 90401 (310) 656-7066

675751-1

Case 1:07-cv-00649-JJF-LPS

Document 9-2

Filed 11/15/2007

Page 1 of 1