Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 54.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 373 Words, 2,322 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 790.8 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39164/33.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 54.3 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv—OO680-IVIPT Document 33 Filed O2/08/2008 Page 1 of 1
PRICKETT, JONES & ELLIOTT
darts ke · Z APROFESSIONALASSOCIATION Over Cc:
W (;02)§;&;lsc1;1m1 1310 KING STREET, Box 1328 11 Noir}; sgi; smear
Wdter`s Tclecopy Number: DOVER,·DELAWARE 19901
\7(/xitcggolgl-1\i;1-Hglililixessz TEL=<¤<>2>888-65¤¤ i¥E§E§3§§2$ii2‘£L
]CATPIEY@pdcketLcom FAX: (302) 658-811.1
http://www.p1·ickctt.com
February 8, 2008
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
The Honorable Mary Pat Thynge
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
844 N. King Street
Wilmington, DE 18901
RE: Innovative Patents, L.L. C. et al v. Brain-Pad, Inc., C.A. N0. 07-680-JJF—MPT
Dear Judge Thynge:
As Your Honor directed during the scheduling conference last Wednesday, January 30,
2008, in the above—referenced matter, we are tiling herewith a form of order that the parties q
believe reflects the letter of the court’s ruling granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs’
Motion to Dismiss Count ll of defendant’s counterclaim. If it meets with Your Honor’s
approval, we respectfully request that it be entered as an Order.
Respectfully,
{ J. Clayt Athe
DE Bar #4378
J CA/sam
Enclosure
cc: Clerk of Court (via Electronic Filing)
Charles J. Brown, lll, Esquire (via Electronic Filing)
20368.l\360266vl

Case 1:07-cv—00680-I\/IPT Document 33;2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
INNOVATIV E PATENTS, L.L.C. and )
FORCEFIELD, LLC, )
Plaintiffs,
v. g Civil Action No. 07-680-JIF-MPT
BRAIN-PAD, INC., g
Defendant. g
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this ____ day of , 2008, that Plaintiffs’
Motion to Dismiss Count H of Defendant’s Counterclaim (D.I. 21) is granted in part and denied in
part, as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Counterclaim asserting inequitable
conduct and misuse of the U.S. Patent No. 7,234,174 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part
without prejudice to the defendant filing an amended counterclaim.
2. Defendant must file an amended Counterclaim no later than February 19, 2008.

zossaixsssossvi

Case 1:07-cv-00680-MPT

Document 33

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 1 of 1

Case 1:07-cv-00680-MPT

Document 33-2

Filed 02/08/2008

Page 1 of 1