Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 65.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 567 Words, 3,274 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39164/60.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 65.4 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :07-cv—00680-IVIPT Document 60 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
_ ARCHER Sc GREINER, P.C.
ATToRNEYs AT LAW
CHARLES J. BROWN III Emi, Addrsss,
Member of Delaware and Maryland Bar 3 00 DELAWARE AVENUE cbmwn@asch€rlaW_cOm
SUITE 1370 Direct Dial: Direct Fax:
WILMINGTON, DE 19801 (302) 356-6621 (302) 777-4352
302-777-43 50
· FAX 302-777-4352
www.archerlaw.com
May 28, 2008
s The Honorable Mary Pat Thynge, U.S.M.J.
I U.S. District Court of the District of Delaware
? 844 N. King Street, Lock Box 18
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
RE: Innovative Patents, L.L.C. et al. v. Brain-Pad, Inc.
C.A. No. 1:07-cv-00680-MPT (Del.)
1 Defendant’s Response to May 23 Letter
Dear Judge Thynge:
We are writing in response to plaintiffs’ counsel’s letter of May 23, 2008, which alleged
that a deposition of Joseph Manzo is required prior to an early Markman hearing.
I Not so. Such a deposition is unnecessary for interpreting the claims in this matter. We
respectfully remind plaintiffs that this is a dispute over interpretation of claims relating to a
headband. As Your Honor acknowledged during the mediation proceedings on May 9, 2008,
claim construction in this matter tums on "common sense," and expert opinions and testimony
I from Joseph Manzo are not required for claim interpretation.
Furthermore, plaintiffs read the court’s Scheduling Order incorrectly. Your Honor’s
February 14, 2008, Scheduling Order provided that dates regarding claim construction may be
"adjust[ed] as appropriate," and that the November 1, 2008, deadline for exchanging a list of
terms and proposed claim construction was to apply only "[i]f the Court does not find that a
limited earlier claim construction would be helpful in resolving this case." In fact, plaintiffs
have already requested defendant’s claim construction charts months before the dates set forth in
Your Honor’s Scheduling Order which provided for such an exchange. This action by plaintiffs
underscores how unnecessary the deposition of Mr. Manzo is to the issue of claim construction.
HADDONFIELD OFFICE PRINCETON OFFICE FLEMINGTON OFFICE PHILADELPHIA OFFICE NEW YORK OFFICE
One Centennial Square 700 Alexander Park Plaza One · One South Broad Street 2 Penn Plaza
Haddcntield, NJ 08083 Suite 102 1 State Route 12, Suite 201 Suite 1600 Suite 1500
P 856-795-2121 Princeton, NJ 08540 Flemington, NJ 08822-1722 Philadelphia, PA 19107 New York, NY 10121
F 856-795-0574 P 609-580-37OO P 908-788-9700 P 215·963—330O P 212-292-4988
F 609-580-0051 F 908-788-7854 F 215-963—9999 F 212-6294568

p Case 1:07-cv—00680-IVIPT Document 60 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
J The Honorable Mary Pat Thynge, U.S.M.J.
May 28, 2008 J
Page 2
This matter is ripe for claim construction now, and discovery, to the extent necessary,
may proceed after an early Markman hearing.
J p ct lly su ig,
it l ,
t . RO ar No. 3368)
CJB/SAG/lsg
cc: Joseph J. Fleischman, Esquire
J. Clayton Athey, Esquire
t Christopher Casieri, Esquire
Mr. Joseph Manzo
John C. Connell, Esquire
John F. Letchford, Esquire
3203914vi
l

Case 1:07-cv-00680-MPT

Document 60

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00680-MPT

Document 60

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 2 of 2