Free Waiver of Service Executed - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cv—OO830—SLFi Docu ment 6 Filed O2/O9/2008 Page 1 of 1
·¢
*
sm sw tRrv tom}
` WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
TO; Wvian Houghton
{NAME or t=La|:·r1‘tFF‘s .·tTr0tu~t£Y OR lm t>.tét·ttEsEN tm t·t.A|N"rlFt'}
I, Jean Miller, lndvidualltr. and as agent ol J.C. Christensen. int:. , acknowledge receipt of your request
(DEFEst1AHT HAMEI
that I vvztive service ofsurnrnons in the action of lvtullaney. Il. et al. v. J.C. Christensen, lnc.. et al. ,
rcamtotv or rurnoto
which is case number 07-830 in the United States District Court
{DOCKET HL.: srt! Ht)
for the NJA District ot` Delaware .
I have also received a copy ofthe complaint in the action, two copies oftltis trslrttment. and a means by which I can
return the sigtted waiver to you without cost to me.
I agree to save the cost ofservice of tt sumntoos and an additional copy ofthe complaint in this ktwsuit by not requiring
that I (or the entity on whose behalf l am acting) be served withjudicial process in the manner provided by Rule 4.
I [or the entity on whose behul fl am acting) will retain all defenses or objections to the lawsuit or to thejurisdietion
or venue of the court except for objections based on a defect inthe summons or in the service ofthe summons.
I understand that ajudgment may be entered against me (or the perry on whose behatfl am acting) if an
ttnsvrer or motion under Rule I2 is not served upon you within 60 days after HQIDS _
roar r. rtsootsr was sum
or within 90 days aher that date if the request was sr. utside the linited States.
{ O3 I I 1 /4 I
M ..4 .4;
““ ’ I ~
E’rint.eti·*Typed Nant . A ,’ [ n QA 4 { {
,
M ¤l
{rmi: rcotzmttnr . n¤=£r:¤»tr·T1 `
Duty to itvald Unnecessary Costs o!'ScrvIr:e ol'Sur¤rnons
Rule 4 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain parties to cooperate in saving unnecessary costs ofscnrrcc of the summons and compltnnt A
dcfrrrtlmt Iomxd ui the Unttrd Statt:1 who, alter beurg notified ufan acne: and cried by a pI1int11'fIoee.*¤.l ia tk Untmd States to warveservree of1u·rnrnons,t’a:!s in
do so will be rtaquzrrd to bear the cost of such scnrrce ucleu good muse be shown for its failure to sign and rerun the walter.
I: rs not good ues: for e failure ro xnivc sewrce that a part;. bclrms that the complain: rr un fotttvtlrtd, oc 5.:1 the actrort has been brought an an improper- piece
or in a cotrrl that Iatltsrurrscltclton over Lite subject matter ofthe at-tion or over ru person or property. A party who waives scmee efthe simmons reumsali dc tenses
rmi nbjuctionstempt any relntinglo Lhe stzntmonsor to the service ofthe simmons), andrnaylstter object to rhejmirdiction olthe eoertortethepizce where the action
lu: been brought
A dcfendamwhowaivzr senin: MLM vrithm the time rpeetliei on the wah-rr fumt u.-ne on the p|a1ntrl'I`s attomrry for unregnercntad plaintiff] a response to the
cnmptrrnc and mtr: also tiles argue} ropyofthe resporue uitli theczoerr Ifthe maine: orr:ot.¤:i u not served uidtrn thisrimr, nd:t‘relt;·;13:nr;tr:·.1y be zkru =r»_;a:r·.t.t
that defendant By waiving service, tt defendant is allowed more time to .·tn:n·v:r than rfthc serrtmoru had been actually served utscn the request fur waiver of service
was received

Case 1:07-cv-00830-SLR

Document 6

Filed 02/09/2008

Page 1 of 1