Free Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv—00844-G|\/IS Document 10 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 1 of 4


IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ;
W FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
WALL CORPORATION §
Plaintiff, g
v. 2 C.A. No. 07-844-GMS
BONDDESK GROUP, L.L.C., and g
BONDDESK TRADING, L.L.C., §
Defendants. g
PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
Plaintiff Wall Corporation ("Wall Corp.") answers Defendants BondDesl< Group,
L.L.C.’s and BondDesl< Trading, L.L.C.’s (collectively "BondDesl<") Counterclaims as follows:
ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS
l. Wall Corp. admits only that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this
action and personal jurisdiction over BondDesl<. Wall Corp. denies any and all remaining
allegations in Paragraph l of BondDesl<’s Counterclaims, which were incorporated by reference
from the proceeding paragraphs in BondDesl<’s Answer.
2. Wall Corp. admits that the ‘363 patent is valid, enforceable and infringed by
BondDesl<. Wall Corp. denies any and all remaining allegations in Paragraph 2 of BondDesl<’s
Counterclaims.
3. Wall Corp. denies the allegations of Paragraph 3 of BondDesl<’s Counterclaims.
4. Wall Corp. admits that BondDesl< has filed a counterclaim for declaratory
judgment. Wall Corp. admits that the Court has jurisdiction over these counterclaims pursuant to
I 1
DB02:6766686.1 066964.100]
I
l

Case 1 :07-cv—00844-GIVIS Document 10 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 2 of 4
28 U.S.C. §§ l33l(a), l338(a), and 1367. Wall Corp. denies any and all remaining allegations in
Paragraph 4 of BondDesk’s Counterclaims.
Reply to Count One of BondDesk’s Counterclaims
5. Wall Corp repeats its answers to Paragraphs 1-4 of BondDesk’s Counterclaims as
if fully set forth herein.
6. Wall Corp. denies the allegations of Paragraph 6 of BondDesk’s Counterclaims.
7. Wall Corp. admits that an actual and judiciable controversy exists between the
parties. Wall Corp. denies any and all remaining allegations in Paragraph 7 of BondDesk’s
Counterclaims.
8. Wall Corp. denies that BondDesl< is entitled to the relief sought in Paragraph 8 of
8 BondDesk’s Counterclaims. Wall Corp. denies any and all remaining allegations in Paragraph 8
li
of BondDesk’s Counterclaims.
Reply to Count Two of BondDesk’s Counterclaims
9. Wall Corp repeats its answers to Paragraphs l-8 of BondDesk’s Counterclaims as
if fully set forth herein.
l0. Wall Corp. denies the allegations of Paragraph l0 of BondDesk’s Counterclaims. E
Reply to BondDesk’s Prayer for Relief
ll. Wall Corp. denies that BondDesk is entitled to the relief requested in Paragraphs
A-H of its Prayer for Relief.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
l2. BondDesk’s counterclaims for declaratory relief are improper because they are
duplicative of claims and issues already in suit between the parties.
ii
2
DB02;6766686.l 066964.100l .

Case 1 :07-cv—00844-GIVIS Document 10 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 3 of 4
III. 1
RELIEF REQ QUESTED
Wall Corp. respectfully requests that BondDesl<’s Counterclaims be dismissed, the Court j
award costs and at1;orney’s fees incurred in connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
285, the Court deny BondDesl< the relief requested in Paragraphs A-H of its Prayer for Relief,
and the Court grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. L
YO G CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
Q Q/(A 5 1
Jo nW. Shaw (No. 362)
Karen E. Keller (No. 4489)
The Brandywine Building 0
1000 West Street, 17th Floor p
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
. (302) 571-6600
j shaw@yc st.com
kl or COUNSEL:
Michael W. Shore, Esquire
Alfonso Garcia Chan, Esquire
Patrick Traister, Esquire
SHORE CHAN BRAGALONE LLP
325 North Saint Paul Street
Suite 4450 1
Dallas, Texas 75201 jj
(214)593—9110
DATED: April 24, 2008

3 1
DBO2:6766686.1 0669641001 g

Case 1 :07-cv—00844-GIVIS Document 10 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1
I, Karen E. Keller, Esquire, hereby certify that on April 24, 2008, a true and correct copy 3
of the foregoing document was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF,
which will send notification that such filing is available for viewing and downloading to the
following counsel of record:
Mary B. Graham, Esquire
Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP
1201 North Market Street
PO Box 1347
Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
I further certify that on April 24, 2008, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be
served by hand delivery on the above-listed counsel of record and the following non-registered
participants in the manner indicated:
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
Michael A. Jacobs, Esquire
[mj [email protected]]
Rita F. Lin, Esquire
[[email protected]] l
Morrison & Foerster LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482

YouNG CoNAwAY STARGATT & TAYLoR, LLP
Karegl E. Keller (No. 44891
The Brandywine Building
1000 West Street, 17th Floor 1
Wilmington, DE 19801 1
(302) 571-6600
kkeller@ycst. com 1
I l
DB02:6757161.1 0669641001
l

Case 1:07-cv-00844-GMS

Document 10

Filed 04/24/2008

Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00844-GMS

Document 10

Filed 04/24/2008

Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00844-GMS

Document 10

Filed 04/24/2008

Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-00844-GMS

Document 10

Filed 04/24/2008

Page 4 of 4