Free Stipulation to EXTEND Time - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:08-cv-00139-GMS

Document 38

Filed 03/27/2008

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FLASHPOINT TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. AIPTEK, INC. et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 08-139 GMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant Bushnell Inc. ("Bushnell") and subject to the approval of the Court, that the time by which Bushnell shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to and including April 30, 2008. Counsel for Defendant has requested this extension to allow additional time to consider how it will respond to the complaint and to consult with its client as to its proposed course of action. No party will be prejudiced by this brief extension.

_ /s/ David J. Margules David J. Margules (I.D. #2254) BOUCHARD MARGULES & FRIEDLANDER, P.A. 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1400 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-3500 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff FlashPoint Technology, Inc.

/s/ Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann (I.D. #405) Mary B. Matterer (I.D. #2696) Amy Arnott Quinlan (I.D. #3021) MORRIS JAMES LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801-1494 (302) 888-6800 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Bushnell Inc.

_

SO ORDERED this ____ day of March, 2008. __________________________________ United States District Court Judge