Free Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:08-cv-00140-GMS

Document 73

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FLASHPOINT TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, D/B/A CINGULAR WIRELESS, HTC AMERICA, INC., HTC CORP., KYOCERA WIRELESS CORP., KYOCERA CORP., LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC., MOTOROLA, INC., NOKIA, INC., NOKIA CORP., PALM, INC., RESEARCH IN MOTION CORP., RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., D/B/A SPRINT PCS, T-MOBILE USA, INC., and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendants § § § § § C.A. No. 08-140-GMS § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § § § § § § § § § § §

PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO RESEARCH IN MOTION CORP.'S COUNTERCLAIMS Plaintiff FlashPoint Technology, Inc. ("FlashPoint") hereby responds to each paragraph of Research In Motion Corp.'s ("RIM Corp.") Counterclaims as follows: PARTIES 1. 2. Upon information and belief, admitted. Admitted. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. Admitted that RIM Corp. purports to state a counterclaim for invalidity and non-

infringement of the patents-in-suit, that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over RIM Corp.'s counterclaims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202, 1331 and 1338, that a real, immediate and justiciable controversy exists between RIM Corp. and FlashPoint relating to the validity of one or more of the patents-in-suit and the infringement of one or more claims of the

{BMF-W0095356.}

Case 1:08-cv-00140-GMS

Document 73

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 2 of 5

patents-in-suit by RIM Corp., and that RIM Corp. has infringed one or more claims of the patents-in-suit, but otherwise denied. 4. Admitted. COUNT 1: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF PATENT INVALIDITY 5. herein. 6. 7. Denied. Admitted. COUNT 2: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT 8. herein. 9. 10. Denied. Admitted. COUNT 3: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 11. herein. 12. Denied. JURY DEMAND 13. No response to Paragraph 13 is required. PRAYER FOR RELIEF In addition to the relief requested in Plaintiff's Original Complaint, Plaintiff respectfully requests a judgment as follows against RIM Corp. as follows: A. That RIM Corp. takes nothing by its Counterclaims; FlashPoint incorporates the replies set forth to Paragraphs 1-10 as if fully set forth FlashPoint incorporates the replies set forth to Paragraphs 1-7 as if fully set forth FlashPoint incorporates the replies set forth to Paragraphs 1-4 as if fully set forth

{BMF-W0095356.}

-2-

Case 1:08-cv-00140-GMS

Document 73

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 3 of 5

B.

That the Court award Plaintiff costs and attorneys' fees incurred in defending

against these Counterclaims; and C. Any and all further relief for Plaintiff as the Court may deem just and proper. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues.

Patrick J. Coughlin Michael J. Dowd Ray Arun Mandlekar COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 231-1058 John F. Ward John W. Olivo, Jr. David M. Hill Michael J. Zinna WARD & OLIVO 380 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 (212) 697-6262 Dated: May 20, 2008

/s/ Evan O. Williford David J. Margules (I.D. No. 2254) Evan O. Williford (I.D. No. 4162) BOUCHARD MARGULES & FRIEDLANDER, P.A. 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1400 Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 573-3500 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Flashpoint Technology, Inc.

{BMF-W0095356.}

-3-

Case 1:08-cv-00140-GMS

Document 73

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 4 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Evan O. Williford, hereby certify that on May 20, 2008, I caused to be electronically filed a true and correct copy of the foregoing document ­ Plaintiff's Reply to Research in Motion Corp.'s Counterclaims ­ with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the following local counsel for defendants: Jeffrey L. Moyer, Esquire Steven J. Fineman, Esquire Richards Layton & Finger One Rodney Square Wilmington, DE 19801 Attorneys for Defendants Nokia, Inc. and Nokia Corp. Josy W. Ingersoll, Esquire John W. Shaw, Esquire Karen E. Keller, Esquire Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, 17th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 Attorneys for Defendant Kyocera Wireless Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC and Motorola, Inc. Arthur G. Connolly, III, Esquire Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz 1007 North Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19899 Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA Inc. Richard L. Horwitz, Esquire David E. Moore, Esquire Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP Hercules Plaza 1313 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Attorneys for Defendants HTC America, Inc., HTC Corp., Research in Motion Corp. and Research in Motion Ltd.

{BMF-W0095356.}

Case 1:08-cv-00140-GMS

Document 73

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 5 of 5

Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Esquire Anne Shea Gaza, Esquire Richards Layton & Finger One Rodney Square Wilmington, DE 19801 Attorneys for Defendant Sprint Spectrum d/b/a Sprint PCS Steven J. Balick, Esquire John G. Day, Esquire Lauren E. Maguire, Esquire Ashby & Geddes 500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 Attorneys for Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Richard K. Herrmann, Esquire Morris James LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801 Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. Rex A. Donnelly, IV, Esquire Joanne Ceballos, Esquire Ratner Prestia 1007 Orange Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 Attorneys for Defendant Palm, Inc.

/s/ Evan O. Williford David J. Margules (I.D. No. 2254) Evan O. Williford (I.D. No. 4162) BOUCHARD MARGULES & FRIEDLANDER, P.A. 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1400 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-3500 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for plaintiff Flashpoint Technology, Inc.

{BMF-W0095356.}