Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 152.4 kB
Pages: 4
Date: September 6, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 815 Words, 5,279 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/40038/11.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Delaware ( 152.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:08-cv—00192-Gl\/IS Document 11 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Verizon Delaware Inc.,
Verizon Maryiand Inc.,
Verizon New England inc.,
Verizon New Jersey Inc., -
Verizon New York Inc.,
. Verizon North Inc.,
Verizon Northwest inc.,
Verizon Pennsylvania inc.,
Verizon Virginia Inc., I
Verizon Washington, DC Inc., `
Verizon West Virginia Inc., _
Plaintiffs,
. VS- cnn Action ne. csi 92—GMS
American PCS Communications L.L.C.,
Nextel of New York, Inc.,
I Nextel Conimunications ofthe l\fIid~Atlantic, `
Inc., _ '
Nextel West Corp., .
PhilIieCo, L.P., .
Sprint Communications Co. LP.,
Sprint Spectrum L.P.,
WireiessCo, L.P.,
Defendants.
D]3]FEN[}ANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF THE TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COWLAINT
Defendants American PCS Communications L.L.C., Nextel of New York, Inc., Nextel
Communications of the Mi Communications Co. L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., and WirelessCo, L.P. hereby move for an
extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint tiled by Plaintiffs Verizon _
Delaware Inc., Verizon Maryiand Inc., Verizon New England Inc., Verizon New Jersey, Inc.,
Verizon New York Inc., Verizon North Inc., Verizon Northwest Inc., Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.,
Verizon Virginia Inc., Verizon Washington, DC inc., and Verizon West Virginia Inc. Plaintiffs

· Case 1 :08-cv—00192-GIVIS Document 11 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 2 of 2
have consented tothe requested extension.
· in support, Defendants state that:
1. Plaintiffs tiled their Complaint on April 4, 2008, and served the Complaint on
Defendants on August 1, 2008. Without the requested extension, Defendants would be required U
to respond to the Complaint by August 21, 2008.
2. The parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle their dispute but need
additional time to finalize their agreement. Accordingly, Plaintiffs have agreed that Defendants
shall have until October 3 l , 2008, to respond tothe Complaint. 3
On that basis, Defendants respectfully request that this Court grant an extension of time
until October 31, 2008, for `Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
Defendants have submitted a proposed Order along with this Motion. `
Dated: August 21, 2008 CROSS & SIMON, LLC
Wilmington, Delaware
Kevin S. Mann (No. 4576)
913 North Market Street, lim Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
(302) 777-4200
(302) 777~4224 (facsimile)
Attorneys for Dekndants

Case 1 :08-cv-00192-GIVIS Document 11-2 Filed 08/21 /2008 Page 1 of 1
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Verizon Delaware Inc.,
Verizon Maryland Inc., ` ‘
Verizon New England Inc.,
Verizon New Jersey Inc.,
Verizon New York Inc., ·
Verizon North Inc., ‘
Verizon Northwest Inc.,
Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.,
Verizon Virginia Inc.,
Verizon Washington, DC Inc.,
Verizon West Virginia Inc.,
Plaintiffs, A
VS' Civii Action No. 08—i92—Gl\/IS
American PCS Communications L.L.C.,
Nextel of New York, Inc.,
I Nextel Communications ofthe Mid—Atiantic, Inc., ‘
Nextel West Corp., -
PhiliieCo, L.P.,
Sprint Communications Co. LP.,
Sprint Spectrum L.P.,
WirelessCo, L.P.,
Defendants. -
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
THE TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension ofthe Time to
Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint is GRANTED. Defendants snail answer
Plaintiffs’ Complaint no iater than October 31, 2008.
Dated:
United States District / Magistrate Judge I

Case 1:08—cv—00192-Gl\/IS Document 11-3 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Kevin S. Mann, hereby certify that on August 2}., 2008, copies of Defendnnts’
‘ Unopposed Motion for Extension of the Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the
Complaint and Order Granting Dei`endnnts’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of the Time
to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint were served upon counsel of record in the A
manner indicated: .
VIA HAND DELIVERY & EMAIL
Kevin F. Brady, Esquire .
CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ, LLP `
l The Nemours Building
i00’7 North Orange Street
BO. Box 2207 _
Wilmington, Deiavvare 39899
kbrad3;@cbll1.corn
VIA FIRST CLASSMAIL & EMAIL
Scott I-I. Angstreich, Esquire
KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS i
& FEGEL, P.L.L.C. .
I6l5 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036 ·
sangstreich(@khhte.com
VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL & EMAIL
Wan J. Kim, Esquire
‘ KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS
& FIGEL, P.L.L.C.
I6} 5 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
wkim@,l VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL & EMAIL -
V Steven Hartinann, Esquire
Verizon
i5i5 N. Courthouse Rd., Suite 500
Arlington, VA 22201.
stevenh.hartmanng@,verizon.com
` 2 "‘-;——- {
Kevin S. Mann (No. 4576)

Case 1:08-cv-00192-GMS

Document 11

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:08-cv-00192-GMS

Document 11

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 2 of 2

Case 1:08-cv-00192-GMS

Document 11-2

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 1 of 1

Case 1:08-cv-00192-GMS

Document 11-3

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 1 of 1