Free Motion for Discovery - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 22.9 kB
Pages: 7
Date: September 6, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,456 Words, 9,358 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/40079/14.pdf

Download Motion for Discovery - District Court of Delaware ( 22.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Discovery - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:08-cr-00059-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS S. PENDLETON, Defendant.

: : : : : : : : :

Criminal Action No. 08-59-GMS

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

AND NOW comes the Defendant, Thomas S. Pendleton, by his attorney Eleni Kousoulis of the Federal Public Defender's Office, and pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, files this Motion for Discovery. In support of this motion, the Defendant avers as follows: 1. By Indictment filed April 10, 2008, Defendant was charged with one count of

failing to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). 2. On April 17, 2008, Defendant entered a plea of not guilty. I. Defendant's Oral Statements 3. On March 11, 2008, Deputy U.S. Marshal William David submitted an affidavit

in support of the criminal complaint which initiated this prosecution. 4. The affidavit describes statements made by Defendant in response to questioning

by Marshal David. 5. It is not clear whether the affidavit reflects all or only some of Defendant's

statements to Marshal David.

Case 1:08-cr-00059-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 2 of 5

6.

In addition, it is not known whether the government may seek to introduce other

statements made to other law enforcement officers. 7. Criminal Rule 16(a)(1)(A) provides for the discovery of a defendant's oral

statements to government agents. 8. Defendant moves for an order of court directing the government to disclose to

defense counsel all of Defendant's oral statements within the scope of Rule 16(a)(1)(A). II. Expert Summary 9. At trial, the government may seek to introduce testimony regarding the operation

of relevant state and federal sex offender registration laws. 10. Such testimony constitutes expert testimony. See United States v. Davis, 471

F.3d 783, 789 (7th Cir. 2006) ("Experts are permitted to testify regarding how their government agency applies rules as long as the testimony does not incorrectly state the law or opine on certain ultimate legal issues in the case.") 11. Criminal Rule 16(a)(1)(G) provides that, at defendant's request, the government

must provide a written summary of expert testimony which the government intends to use in its case-in-chief. 12. Consistent with Criminal Rule 16(a)(1)(G), Defendant moves for an order of

court directing the government to provide defense counsel with a written summary of expert testimony regarding the operation of state and federal sex offender registration laws. III. Defendant's Inquiries Regarding Duty To Register 13. In a prosecution for failure to register as a sex offender, the burden is on the

government to prove that Defendant "knowingly fails to register or update a registration." 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)(3) (emphasis added).

2

Case 1:08-cr-00059-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 3 of 5

14.

At trial, defense counsel intends to argue that there is reasonable doubt regarding

Defendant's knowledge of the duty to register. 15. The evidence at trial will reflect that during the years 2006 and 2007, Defendant

was incarcerated in Germany for a sex offense. 16. Defendant is prepared to testify that during and after his incarceration, he

communicated with U.S. consular and immigration officials, seeking to determine whether, upon his return to the United States, he had a legal duty to register as a sex offender. 17. Defendant is also prepared to testify that in their responses, consular and

immigration officials did not tell him that he had a duty to register. 18. Documents provided in discovery reflect that Defendant did, in fact, make

inquiries regarding his duty to register. 19. It is not clear whether the defense has been provided with all or only some of the

papers, documents and data reflecting the Defendant's inquiries and the government's responses. 20. Criminal Rule 16(a)(1)(E)(i) provides for discovery of papers, documents and

data which are "material to preparing the defense." 21. In this case, the requested data is material to preparing a defense on the element

of "knowingly" failing to register as a sex offender. 22. Defendant moves for an order of court directing the government to disclose to

defense counsel all papers, documents and data generated during 2006, 2007 and 2008, reflecting Defendant's inquiries to immigration and consular officials regarding sex offender registration, and also reflecting the responses of immigration and consular officials.

3

Case 1:08-cr-00059-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 4 of 5

IV. Rules Applicable To Foreign Sex Offender Convictions 23. The Indictment alleges that Defendant's duty to register as a sex offender arises

from two prior convictions. 24. One of the alleged prior convictions is a German conviction entered on

October 16, 2006. 25. Federal law provides a mechanism for notifying prisoners of their duty to register

as sex offenders. 26. Section 16917 of title 42 is captioned "Duty to notify sex offenders of registration

requirements and to register." 27. Subsection (a) of Section 16917 provides that "shortly before release of the sex

offender from custody," an "appropriate official shall" (1) inform the sex offender of his duties "under this subchapter," (2) require the sex offender to "read and sign a form" reflecting that he "understands the registration requirements;" and (3) "ensure that the sex offender is registered." 42 U.S.C. § 16917(a)(1)­(3). 28. Subsection (b) of § 16917 provides that "[t]he Attorney General shall prescribe

rules for the notification of sex offenders who cannot be registered in accordance with subsection (a) of this section." 42 U.S.C. § 16917(b) (emphasis added). 29. Persons who are convicted of foreign sex offenses, and who serve their sentences

in foreign prisons, cannot be registered in accordance with subsection (a) of 42 U.S.C. § 16917; the Attorney General therefore has an obligation, under subsection (b) of 42 U.S.C. § 16917, to prescribe rules for the notification of such sex offenders. 30. Defense counsel has looked for, but has not found, any rules for the notification

of sex offenders who cannot be registered under 42 U.S.C. § 16917(a).

4

Case 1:08-cr-00059-GMS

Document 14

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 5 of 5

31.

Defendant seeks discovery of any and all rules, prescribed by the Attorney

General under 42 U.S.C. § 16917(b), for the notification of sex offenders who cannot be registered in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 16917(a). 32. Criminal Rule 16(a)(1)(E)(i) provides for the discovery of papers, documents and

data which are "material to preparing the defense." 33. If discovery reveals that the Attorney General failed to prescribe the required

rules, knowledge of that omission would be "material to preparing the defense," because it would provide grounds for filing a motion to dismiss the indictment; the motion to dismiss would cite the failure to provide the notice required by the statute, and would also cite the failure to provide notice as required by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. 34. Defendant moves for an Order of Court directing the government to disclose to

defense counsel any and all rules prescribed by the Attorney General under 42 U.S.C. § 16917(b). WHEREFORE, it is requested that Defendant's Motion for Discovery be GRANTED. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Eleni Kousoulis Eleni Kousoulis, Esquire Assistant Federal Public Defender 704 King Street, Suite 110 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 573-6010 [email protected] Attorney for Defendant Thomas S. Pendleton Date: May 1, 2008

5

Case 1:08-cr-00059-GMS

Document 14-2

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS S. PENDLETON, Defendant. : : : : : : : : :

Criminal Action No. 08-59-GMS

ORDER OF COURT AND NOW this ________ day of ________________, 2008, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Discovery, it is hereby ordered that the motion is GRANTED. 1. Within _______ days of this Order, the government shall disclose to defense counsel

all of Defendant's oral statements within the scope of Rule 16(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 2. Within _______ days of this Order, the government shall provide to defense counsel

a written summary of expert testimony regarding the operation of state and federal sex offender registration laws, said summary to comply with the requirements of Rule 16(a)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 3. Within ______ days of this Order, the government shall provide defense counsel with

copies of all papers, documents and data generated during the years 2006, 2007 and 2008, reflecting Defendant's inquiries to immigration and consular officials regarding sex offender registration, and also reflecting the responses of immigration and consular officials.

Case 1:08-cr-00059-GMS

Document 14-2

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 2 of 2

4.

Within ______ days of this Order, the government shall disclose to defense counsel

all rules and regulations prescribed by the Attorney General under 42 U.S.C. § 16917(b).

BY THE COURT, _________________________________ Honorable Gregory M. Sleet Chief Judge, United States District Court