BRUCE L. SILVERSTEIN KAEAS HAMMOND WILLIAM W" />

Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 124.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 868 Words, 5,374 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7486/24.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 124.5 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-00134-KAJ Document 24 Filed 03/30/2005 Page 1 of 2
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
xA;;1'S3RGATT M BLAKE CLEARY THE BRANDYWINE BUILDING H Al.]l;E2gEl{;g-)UNG
?1T€1'§Z1°$S§ ESUKEER 1000 WEST STREET, 17TH Frooiz 1+ MME5 ¤0MA~1/M. JR
R{CHARDA ZAPPA ATHANASIOSE AGELAKOPOULOS *947-*990
FREDERICK W. lOBST JOSEPH M BARRY W1LMrNoToN, DELAWARE 19801 WMJAM F TAYLOR
mc1aAnD11. Monsrz KEv1NM BMRD IQSMOO4
DAVIDC McBruDE glgmll/I; §%1;\&$MAN JR
i;O;§(¥;H,iV1ig\IAi;(5;i~l?§ON TIMOTHY? CAIRNS ` P_O_ BQX 391
BAREYM WlLLOUGHBY Cu1 10sv w INGERSGLL MM<¤A¤¤ M ¤¤BM~¤A W1LM1NGroN, DELAWARE 19899-0391 EDWARD D W1AxWEn.. TWD
ANTHONY G. FLYNN EIUN EDWARDS Op QOUNSEL
JEROMEK GROSSMAN §EqN;Eg§EJD§;g;S
E . _L_._.
1XSE§"EYi»£$S1T?L° AMES] GALLAGHER (302) 571-6600
SVOBERT Lbrpovms R»S;§;1§§1n§gODMAN (800) 253-2234 (DE ONLY) icgimp Il:}/lgL.AUgl~lIl:1IN, JR
L1 OHNSTON - .· A
Dibs-£}E1.S.Wm SDM GREECHER FAX: (302) 571-1255 EL ’““S,,,,,,‘,§’;’,,,,;,§ °"“>
BRUCE L. SILVERSTEIN KAEAS HAMMOND
WILLIAM W Bowsan DAWN M JONES , 2.;....
LARRY] TARABKCQS R1c1~1A1zD S. JULIE WRITER S DIRECT DIAL NUMBERS
RJCHARDA DIl..1BERTO,,lR KELLER VOICE. 3O2_57l_6672 QEORGETOWN OFFICE
¥‘,$§§¥5§§A?L§§§Em ¥’§’€JK1$é`1M1z£“£.‘2`i$sK1 FAX: 302-576-.1301 ··¤W¤S1P¤~ES0 R1cHA1zDJA POPPER JOHNC KUEEEL P O BOX 594
TERESA A CHEEK Tmgmy E_ L,gN51q;5K H GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947
NE11.u MULLHN WA1511 MATTHEW B LUNN E—MAlL: [email protected] (302) ssc-2571
JANETZ CHARLTON 5551;;% Mgggggig (800) 255-2224 (DE ONLY)
§i§’§F§'€01‘?¥‘Q”' ABR]/\B Wrimtr. r»~><= EM **56*9338
BRENTC S11A1=rEr< M1c1~1AELW MCDERMOTT
DAN1ELP JOHNSON MATTHEWB MCGUIRE
CRAIG D G1>.EA1z MA1z11aET11L MTNELLA
T1MoT1-1Y JAY HousEAL EDMON L MORTON
BRENDAN LXNEHAN SHANNON D FUN MUTTAMARA-WALKER
MARTIN S. LESSNER JENNIFERR NOEL
1>AuL1NE1< MORGAN JOHN} PAsc11ErT0
Siizitm ?€%§."3WR§§§§ BERG March 50, 2005
LISA B. GOODMAN FRANCIS J. SCHANNE
JOHNW SHAW MICHELE SHEREETTA
JAMES? HUGHES, Jn M1c1·1AELP STAFFORD
EDw1NJ 1~1A1uz0N JOHNE T RACEY
M1cHAEL R. NEsr01z ALFRED VILLOCH, 111
MAUREEN D L.u1 Rouw P BISSELL CHRISTIAN DOUGLAS \V1uG11‘r
SCOTT A. HOLT SHARON M ZIEG
.10nNT DORSEY
BY ELECTRONIC FILING
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
United States District Court
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Ingenio, Filiale De Loto-Quebec, Inc. v. GTECH Corporation,
Civil Action No. 04-134-KAJ
Dear Judge Jordan:
As counsel for Defendant GTECH, I write on behalf of both parties to jointly request a
modification of the September 3, 2004 Scheduling Order entered in this case. The proposed
modification to the Scheduling Order, which, Subj ect to the Court’s approval, has been stipulated
and agreed to by the parties, extends the schedule by 90 days. The reasons for the proposed
extension are explained below. A proposed Amended Scheduling Order is enclosed herewith for
the Court’s reference and consideration.
The parties have been actively engaged in settlement discussions and, in fact, have
voluntarily entered into mediation. An all—day, private mediation session with counsel and
settlementrepresentatives of each party, was held on March 23, 2005. While a settlement did
not result from that mediation, the parties intend to continue to discuss settlement and will
engage in another mediation session with the Magistrate Judge on April 22, 2005. During the
WP3:109B645.l 63055.1003

Case 1:04-cv—00134—KAJ Document 24 Filed 03/30/2005 Page 2 of 2
Youuo CoNAwAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
March 30, 2005
Page 2
time period that this mediation process has been taking place, the parties have concentrated their
efforts on settlement through this avenue and have not pursued discovery in the hopes that the
need for such discovery, and the attendant cost and expense, would be obviated by a mutually
agreeable settlement of this matter. The Scheduling Order in place currently sets the close of
fact and expert discovery for September 30, 2005. The parties are concerned since this schedule
does not provide sufficient time to complete discovery, should this case not resolve on or before
the next mediation session. ln light of this, the parties are jointly requesting the proposed
modified schedule.
Since the proposed extension will impact previously scheduled dates including the trial
date, we respectfully request the opportunity to discuss this request with the Court in a
teleconference to be held at the Court’s convenience.
We thank the Court for its consideration of the above.
Respectfully submitted,
J osy W. Ingersoll (No. 1088)
JWI:cg
cc: Clerk of the Court (by electronic filing and hand delivery)
Thomas H. Kovach, Esquire (by electronic filing)
Rodger Tate, Esquire (by e-mail)
Brian Buroker, Esquire (by e-mail)
Thomas J. Meloro, Esquire (by e-mail)
Larissa A. Soccoli, Esquire (by e—mail)
WP3:lO98645.1 63055.1003

Case 1:04-cv-00134-KAJ

Document 24

Filed 03/30/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00134-KAJ

Document 24

Filed 03/30/2005

Page 2 of 2