Free Stipulation of Dismissal - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 295.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 436 Words, 2,909 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7487/117.pdf

Download Stipulation of Dismissal - District Court of Delaware ( 295.8 kB)


Preview Stipulation of Dismissal - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-00135-GIVIS Document 1 17 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

I
MAGNEQUENCH INTERNATIONAL, INC., )
Plaintiff, g
v. )
gl C.A. No. 04-I35—GMS
SONY CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION )
OF AMERICA, SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., )
ACER INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., ASUS )
COMPUTER NTERNATIONAL INC., g
UOMAGIC CORPORATION, IOMEGA )
CORPORATION, LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ) ‘
ELECTRONICS USA, INC., LG INNOTEK )
COMPANY, LTD., LG INNOTEK USA, INC., )
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, )
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY NTERNATIONAL, )
INC., LITE-ON PERIPHERALS, INC., LITE-ON )
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY )
CORPORATION, MEMOREX PRODUCTS
(TAIWAN) LTD., MEMOREX PRODUCTS, INC., g
MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, )
LTD., MSI COMPUTER CORPORATION, )
MITSUIVII ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD., )
MITSUMI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,
TEAC CORPORATION, TEAC AMERICA, INC., )
AND VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, g
LIIVIITED. )
Defendants. g

STIPULATION ANI) [PROPOSED| ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AS TO THE DEFENDANTS TEAC CORPORATION AND
TEAC AMERICA, INC.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiff Magnequench
Lntemational, Inc. ("Magnequench"), and defendants, TEAC Corporation and TEAC America,
Inc. (collectively "TEAC"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, that, pursuant to

Case 1 :04-cv—00135-GIVIS Document 117 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 2 of 2
Rule 41 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action be and hereby is dismissed in its
entirety without prejudice as to TEAC subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement between
Magnequench and TEAC, which has an effective date of July B, 2005 ("Settlement Agreement"),
and that each party shall bear its own costs and expenses, including attorney fees, incurred in
connection with this action. Magiiequenclfs Complaint with regard to the other defendants
remains in effect unless and until specifically dismissed.
STIPULATED AND AGREED T0:
jvc.; fp,2005 QE 10 ,2005
Mary B. aham (#2256) M. Duncan Grant (#2994)
Karen J a obs Londen (#288}) Pepper Hamilton LLP
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel] Hercules Plaza, Suite 5100
1201 N. Market Street 1313 Market Street
P.O. Box L347 P.O. Box 1709
Wilmington, DE 19899 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1709
(302) 65 8-9200 (302) 777-6544
Of Counsel: Of Counsel:
Brian M. Poissant Scott M. Gettleson
Thomas G. Rowan Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Leo Merken 525 West Monroe Street
Jones Day Chicago, Illinois 60661-3693
222 East 4151 Street (312) 902-5302
New York, NY 100I7
(212)326—3939
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants
Magnequench international, Inc. TEAC Corporation and
TEAC America, Inc.
Dated: S0 Ordered:
United States District Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00135-GMS

Document 117

Filed 08/10/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00135-GMS

Document 117

Filed 08/10/2005

Page 2 of 2