Exhibit B
Case 2:02-cv-02157-SRB
Document 78-4
Filed 07/17/2006
Page 1 of 5
\-11 (rev. 5/00)
~"
"
Page 1 of2
,SCA DOCKET # (IF KNOWN)
"
Form 6. Civil Appeals Docketing Statement
~
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT
?LEASE ATTACH ADDmONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY.
i
i
TITLE IN FULL: Joyce A. Corrales,
IDISTRICT: Arizona
Plaintiff,
DISTRICT COURT NUMBER: DATE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED: Feb. 20, 2004
R]DGE:Susan
R.
Bolton
vs.
Chase Bankcard Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, d.b.a. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Defendant.
CIV 02"""2157-PHX~SRB
IS TIllS ACROSS-APPEAL?
0
YES
IF THIS MAITER HAS BEEN BEFORE TIllS COURT PREVIOUSLY, PLEASE PROVIDE TIIE DOCKET NUMBER AND CITATION (IF ANY):
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF ACTION AND RESULT BELOW:
Plaintiff filed 3 count commotion to dismiss count
plaint
against
former
employer,
"
including
count one a.lleging sexual harass-
ment in violation of Title VII.
Disty Couftgranted . ~ .
PRINCIPAL ISSUES PROPOSED TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL: ~'hether the facts plead in the Plaintiff's complaint stated a claim for relief for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 D.S.C. 2000e-2(a), in rhp r.onrpxr or ~ mnrion rn nismiss under Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. Rule 12 PLEASE IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON TIllS CASE (INCLUDE PENDING DISTRICT COURT POST-J1JDGMENT MOTIONS):
DOES THIS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
0
Possibility of settlement
0 0 0
Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal Likelihood of a motion to expedite or to stay the appeal, or other procedural matters (Specify) Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program
0
Possibility parties would stipulate to binding award by Appellate Commissioner in lieu of submission to judges
Case 2:02-cv-02157-SRB
Document-878-4
Filed 07/17/2006
Page 2 of 5 Effective
7/lflOOO
-.u
. - .-
LOWER COURT INFORMATION
JURISDICTION , FEDERAL
FEDERAL QUESTION APPELLATE
Page 2 of2
DISTRICT C,- JRT DISPOSITION TYPEOF JUDGMENT/ORDER APPEALED RELIEF
FINALDECISION OF
DISTRICT COURT
0 0
0 0 -
DEFAULTJUDGMENT
DISMISSAL/JURISDICTION
D
0
DAMAGES:
SOUGHT $ AWARDED $
INJUNCTIONS:
D
0 -
DIVERSITY
0
INTERLOCUTORY
DECISION APPEALABLE
r.xr DISMISSALIMERlTS
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OTIffiR
(SPECIFY):
AS OF RIGHT
0
0
PRELIMINARY
PERMANENT
0 -
JUDGMENT/COURTECISION D JUDGMENT/JURY VERDICT
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
INTERLOCUTORY
ORDER CERTIFIED BY DISTRICT JUDGE (SPECIFY):
0 0 -
0 0 0
GRANTED DENIED
0 -
0 OTIlER
(SPECIFY):
JUDGMENT ASA MATTEROFLAW ATTORNEY FEES: SOUGHT$ AWARDED S OTIffiR(SPECIFY):
0
0 0
CERTIFICATION
I CERTIFY THAT:
PENDING
COSTS: $ .
OF COUNSEL
1. COPIESOFORDER/JUDGMENT PPEALED A FROMAREATTACHED. 2. 3.
YES
No(SEE9TII
A CURRENTSERVICELISTORREPRESENTATION STATEMENT WITHTELEPHONE ANDFAXNUMBERSI~rtACHED CIR.RULE3-2) because the Appellant is pro per. 9th Cir. Rule 3-2(a)3. A COpy OF TIIISCIVILAPPEALSDOCKETING STATEMENT WASSERVED COMPLIANCE IN WITHFRAP25.
YES
Fphruary 20, 2004 Date
NAME: FIRM: ADDRESS:
;
SEL WHO COMPLETED TillS FORM r)
E-MAn..: TELEPHONE: FAX:
*TlUS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEAL * *IF FILED LATE, IT SHOULD BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS *
Case 2:02-cv-02157-SRB
Document-978-4
Filed 07/17/2006
Page 3 of 5
Effective 7/1/2000
~-11 (rev. 5/00)
Page 1 of2
USCA DOCKET # (IF KNOWN)
Form 6. Civil Appeals Docketing Statement
,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CML APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT
?LEASEATTACHADDITIONAL PAGESIFNECESSARY.
I
TITLE IN FULL: Joyce A. Corrales, Plaintiff, vs. Chase Bankcard Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, d.b.a. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Defendant.
.
r;ISTRICT: Arizona
DISTRICT COURT NUMBER:
nJDGE:Susan R. Bolton
CIV 02.,..2157-PHX-SRB
FILED: F eb OF APPEAL DATE NOTICE 20, 2004
.
I
IS THISACROSS-APPEAL?
Q
YES
IF THIS MATTER HAS BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCKET NUMBER AND CITATION (IF ANY):
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF ACTION AND RESULT BELOW:
Plaintiff filed 3 count com-
plaint against former employer, including count one alleging sexual harassment in violation of Title VII. Dist, Court granted motion to dismiss count
PRINCIPAL ISSUES PROPOSED TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL: V'v"'hether the facts plead in the Plaintiff's complaint stated a claim for relief for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a) in rnp r.onrpxr of ~ morion ro dismiss under Fed. Rules civ. Proc. Rule 12( PLEASE IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LEGAL PROCEtDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON TIllS CASE (INCLUDE PENDING DISTRICT COURT POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS):
,
DOES TIllS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
0
Possibility of settlement
0 "Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal 0 Likelihoodof a motionto expediteor to staythe appeal,or otherproceduralmatters(Specify)
0 Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program
0
Possibility parties would stipulate to binding award by Appellate Commissioner in lieu of submission to judges
Case 2:02-cv-02157-SRB
Document -878-4
Filed 07/17/2006
Page 4 of 5
Effective 7/112000
--.__M.__.-
-JURlSDICTION , FEDERAL
FEDERAL QUESTION
LOWERCOURTINFORMATION
DISTRICT CuURT DISPOSITION TYPEOF JUDGMENT/ORDERPPEALED A RELIEF APPELLATE FINALDECISIONOF
DISTRICT COURT
Page2 of2
D D
0 D -
DEFAULTJUDGMENT
DISMISSAL/JURISDICTION DISMISSALIMERITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT JUDGMENT/COURT DECISION JUDGMENT/JURY VERDICT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
D D -
DAMAGES:
SOUGHT $ AWARDED $ INJUNCTIONS:
D
O -
DIVERSITY
D -
INTERLOCUTORY
DECISION APPEALABLE AS OF RIGHT
OTIffiR
(SPECIFY):
D -
PRELIMINARY PERMANENT
D -
INTERLOCUTORY
ORDERCERTIFIED BY DISTRICTJUDGE
(SPECIFY):
D D D 0
D D
0
0
GRANTED DENIED
JUDGMENT ASAMATTER OFLAW
ATTORNEY FEES:
0 -
OTIffiR
(SPECIFY):
OTIffiR(SPECIFY):
SOUGHT$ AWARDED$
0 0
.
PENDING
COSTS:$ .
CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
I CERTIFY THAT:
1. 2. 3. COPIESOF ORDER/JUDGMENT PPEALEDFROMAREATTACHED. A
CIR. RULE 3-2)
YE.S
.
A CURRENTSERVICELIST ORREPRESENTATION STATEMENT WITHTELEPHONE ANDFAXNUMBERSISM.TTACHED (SEE9TH
NoT
because
the Appellant
is pro per. 9.th Cir. Rule 3-2 (a) 3.
A COpy OFTIllS CIVll..APPEALSDOCKETING STATEMENT WASSERVEDIN COMPLIANCE WITHFRAP25.
YES
iff~Appellant
Pro Per
Fp.hruary 20, 2004
Date
NAME:
FIRM: ADDRESS:
i
SEL WHO COMPLETED TIDS FORM r)
E-MAil..: TELEPHONE: FAX: *Tms DOCUMENT SHOULD BE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEAL *IF FILED LATE, IT SHOULD BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS * *
Case 2:02-cv-02157-SRB
Document 78-4 -9-
Filed 07/17/2006
Page 5 of 5 Effective 7/1/2000