Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

] LAW OFFICE
STUART REII-LY, P.C.
2 PO Box 80410
Phoenix, Arizona 85060-0410
3 Telephone: 602/912-9200
4 E-mail: [email protected]
Stuart]. Reilly, #005275
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 .
Stuart J. Reilly, )
10 ) Case No. CIV 02-2218 PHX BTM
Plaintiff, )
11 )
vs. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN
12 ) ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
13 Charles M. Brewer, Ltd. Profit Sharing Plan )
and Trust, a retirement plan, Charles M. )
14 Brewer, Ltd. Restated Pension Plan, a )
retirement plan, and Charles M. Brewer, )
15 )
Defendants. )
16 )
)
17 )
18 )
19 The Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 6(b) Fed.R.Civ.P., upon good cause shown, moves this
2O Court for an enlargement of the briefing schedule previously set.
2] MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
22 This Court has allowed the Plaintiff to present a rebuttal to the expert testimony of
23 defense witness, Kurt Piper, by means of a Declaration from Thomas Shardlow. The deadline
24 for submission of this Declaration is May 12, 2006.
25 The Court was informed that Mr. Shardlow would be on vacation and out of the country
26 from April 25, 2006 to May 10, 2006. Since his return, Mr. Shardlow has been suffering from
-1-
1>LA1NT11¤F’s Monoiv Fox AN ENLARGEMENT or nivus
Ca 2:02-cv-0221 8-BT|\/li]l%’l5V‘ ClbB¤b1P¤l’5%l‘&S}*7““NG|i°Hé#EH”é“$’/1*§1/§'0b1e“L Page 1 of 3

1 an extreme case of food poisoning and has been totally incapacitated. As a result Mr. Shardlow
2 has been unable to give any attention to the review of Mr. Piper’s testimony and the preparation
3 of his rebuttal. The food poisoning is slowly running its course and it is believed that a short
4 extension of the briefing schedule, which would allow the Declaration to be submitted on
5 Wednesday, May 17, 2006, the parties’ Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Friday,
6 May 19, 2006, and the parties’ Replies on Wednesday, May 24, 2006, would be reasonable in
7 view ofthe good cause shown.
8. This motion is supported by the Declaration of the Plaintiff
9
10 SUBMITTED this 12th day of May 2006.
11 STUART J. REILLY, P.C.
12
1 3 s/ Stuart J- Reilly
Stuart I. Reilly
14 Attorney for Plaintiff
15
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
Ca 2:02-cv-0221 8-BT|\/li]l%`l‘5V‘ C15B¤l:IP¤1’5%‘i‘ESt*7““NG#°Hé#EHté“5°/l‘§J/§T0bT6“L Page 2 or 3

1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3 I hereby certify that on May 12, 2006, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the
Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic
4 Filing to be electronically mailed to:
5 Ed Hendricks, Esq.
Michael K. Dana, Esq.
6 MEYER HENDRICKS PLLC
3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
7 Phoenix, AZ 85012
8 Michael Vanic, Esq.
9 C. Frederick Reish, Esq.
REISH LUFTMAN REICHER & COHEN
1Q 11755 Wilshire Blvd., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90025-1539
1 1
12 Courtesy copy of the attached document mailed this 12th day of May 2006 to:
13 Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz
United States District Court
14 5160 Courthouse
940 Front Street
15 San Diego, CA 92101
16 s/ Marisa J Reilly
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
1>rArNrrFF’s Morrow Fora AN ENLARGEMENT or rnvnz
Ca 2:02-cv-0221 3-BT|\/F1l‘3i3V· “b%1:lP¤l’5i%‘i‘§Sl*7*R‘NG|i°HéiEH fc5“€/1*%/5066* Page 3 or 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 277

Filed 05/12/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 277

Filed 05/12/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 277

Filed 05/12/2006

Page 3 of 3