Free Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6

Charles F. Hauff, Jr. (AZ Bar No. 014465) Douglas W. Seitz (AZ Bar No. 004258) Daniel R. Pote (AZ Bar No. 018570) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. One Arizona Center 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Telephone: (602) 382-6000 Attorneys for Eberle Design, Inc. and Electronic Devices, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8 9 10

Eberle Design, Inc., and Electronic Devices, Inc., Plaintiff/Counterdefendants,

11

CIV 02 2575 PHX DGC (Lead) CIV 03 883 PHX DGC (Consolidated) EBERLE'S MOTION TO AMEND SEPTEMBER 27, 2005 ORDER DENYING EBERLE'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

v.
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

12

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

Reno A&E,
13

Defendant/Counterplaintiff.
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Eberle Design, Inc. and Electronic Devices, Inc. (collectively, "Eberle") hereby file their Motion to Amend September 27, 2005 Order Denying Eberle's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. In this Court's Order dated September 27, 2005 ( Doc. # 216, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), Item No. 3 denies Eberle's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law in its entirety. However, the trial transcript for the afternoon of September 8, 2005 reflects that the Court granted Eberle's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Claim 34. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are copies of the pages of the trial transcript reflecting that ruling. Accordingly, Eberle moves the Court to amend the Order denying their Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law to reflect that the Motion was granted as to Claim 34 and denied in all other respects.
Case 2:02-cv-02575-DGC Document 217 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 29th day of September, 2005. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

By

/s/ Chuck F. Hauff Charles F. Hauff, Jr. Douglas W. Seitz Daniel R. Pote Attorneys for Plaintiff, Eberle Design, Inc. and Electronic Devices, Inc.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case 2:02-cv-02575-DGC
1732768.1

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

Document 217

Filed 09/29/2005

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of the law offices of Snell & Wilmer, and that on this date I electronically transmitted the attached Motion to Amend September 27, 2005 Order Denying Eberle's Motion for Judgement As A Matter of Law to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: The Honorable David G. Campbell (paper copy via hand delivery) United States District Judge District of Arizona Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse, Suite 623 401 W. Washington Street SPC 58 Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2156 Michael D. Rounds, Esq. WATSON & ROUNDS 5371 Kietzke Lane Reno, Nevada 89511 Henry C. Bunsow HOWREY, SIMON, ARNOLD & WHITE 525 Market Street Suite 3600 San Francisco, CA 94105 George C. Chen BRYAN CAVE Two North Central Avenue, Suite 2200 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4406

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

Dated: September 29, 2005 /s/ Patricia Dooley An Employee of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

3 Case 2:02-cv-02575-DGC
1732768.1

Document 217

Filed 09/29/2005

Page 3 of 3