Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

F E
_ I ` A UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, N0. 03-10556
D.C. No. CR—03-00364-SRB
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. - ‘
JUDGMENT
. ALEJANDRO MANJARKE}-ZUNIGA» - , _ _. ,. UUUU ., _ - ._____ _. R .
aka Alexander Garcia-Lopez aka Alex ‘ ‘ ` ` I I F``"` ` ” _ ·
Zuniga-Lopez aka Alex Zu Iay Lopez,
Defendant- Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona ·
(Phoenix).
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and hereby is DISMISSED.
Filed and entered 08/04/05 ·
AITRUE cc>1=>v
cAT¤—|v A. cArrEr2s0N
Clerk of Court
Amzst
. I p AUG 2 B 2005
I · _-—.. _
Case 2:03—cr—00364-SRB Document 44 Filed 08/26/2005 Pa - • Bmw CH

. . * ` FILED
Nor Pon PUBLICATION AUG 04 2005
UNITED STATES cotnzr OF APPEALS °’"'J¥-”?f<$·li=¤`fr<'i·*3»¥»"·¥`A°€'§ERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-10556
A Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. CR-03-00364-SRB
wv., T — T ·-*— T- ‘ ~-j-——·—·@·-t'- - --— -·· #-4- - 1, .,- ..,4 . 4 .-. A4-E; .I., .,_g..u, _, l. A.
A MEMORANDUM* A
ALEJANDRO MANJARREZ-ZUNIGA,
aka Alexander Garcia-Lopez aka Alex
Zuniga—Lopez aka Alex Zu Iay Lopez,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
` for the District of Arizona
Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 1, 2005 ""
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
— Alejandro Manjarrez-Zuniga appeals his conviction and the 7L—411enth»4~ A A A-A4-,
sentence imposed after his guilty plea to illegal re-entry after deportation, in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § l362(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
'" This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited l
to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
"` This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without _
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Case 2:03-cr-00364-SRB Document 44 Filed 08/26/2005 Page 2 of 3

A § 1291 and we dismiss this appeal.
Appellant contends that his appeal waiver is inapplicable because his
sentence falls outside what was agreed upon in his plea agreement. The record
l belies his contention. l
Accordingly, we dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United
y - SMS *1 .Ng*t.J;€¢£» 235__F-3d}.ll9».}.l§%(?tb§?.i1;?0992. .($?§1i¤§ {hell? §B12;"EL. - nn,
waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); see also United
States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that the changes
_ in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2004), did
not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing). A
DISMISSED.
t 3,Jli-t*¢EA°?8ET‘§ERS¤N
§1(eél§Tof Court
2 A AUG 2 6 2005
Case 2:03-cr—00364-SRB Document 44 Filed 08/26/2005 2 ct

Case 2:03-cr-00364-SRB

Document 44

Filed 08/26/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00364-SRB

Document 44

Filed 08/26/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00364-SRB

Document 44

Filed 08/26/2005

Page 3 of 3