1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 This court specifically finds the ends of justice served by taking this action outweigh the 23 24 25 26 27 28 best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. This finding is based on the court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel and would deny the attorney for defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(b)(IV). ON MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, WITH GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND NO OBJECTION BY THE GOVERNMENT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED continuing the February 6, 2007, trial date to the ________ day of _________, 2007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the deadline to file pre-trial motions to the ________ day of ________, 2007. MARVIN JERMAIN ERROL BURNET, (FIRST REQUEST) Defendant. v. United States of America, CR 03-00470-005-PHX-SRB Plaintiff, ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:03-cr-00470-SRB
Document 156-2
Filed 01/06/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excluded delay under Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) will commence on __________, 2006, for a total of days.
FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED vacating the January 22, 2007, 4:00 p.m. Status Conference as to this defendant only.
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DATED this day of ______________, 2007.
2
Case 2:03-cr-00470-SRB
Document 156-2
Filed 01/06/2007
Page 2 of 2