Free Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I F Q `I `i?1:.Z; TZ, i:?,i..§i§ZZ?Q iiffii ¥1·?1?.§§-F PY :1; :: ZZ ;·;;i;i;-.-Li ‘$ if QZ ; ·;,T V iff? ~ “ 2 e
I UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I I- I E D
FOR THE NINTH IR
- C Cm Juts 1 zcus
umrsn srxres or AMERICA, No. 06-10205 °GL*fL‘2;§,§¥'§§S2§tE§i*;”
Plaintiff- Appellee, ` D.C. No. CR-03-00974-DGC I
` District of Arizona, _ _ -
v. I Phoenix
NEILRUSTYBOND, I - UW 0 I I Ali
ORDER
Defendant - Appellant.
` Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner
Appellant’s renewed motion to continue briefing for 60 days is construed as
a motion for a second extension of time to tile the opening brief So construed, the
motion is granted. The opening brief is due September 24, 2006. Further delay in
filing the opening brief is disfavored. _
The answering brief is due October 24, 2006, and the optional reply brief is ‘
due I4 days after service ofthe answering brief
,_.. .- , r . Counsel represents thattltedistrict court ganted,defendant_’,s motionfor _ , __ p , ,
release pending appeal. The provisions ofthe clerk’s June 29, 2006 order that
expedited the briefing and calendaring of this appeal are therefore vacated. This
appeal shall be removed from the November 2006 calendar and calendared in due A
course. - A
éger 6.3(e)
promo commissioner 7.24.06/cb L
_Case 2:03-cr-00974-DGC Document 221 Filed O8/O4/2006 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:03-cr-00974-DGC

Document 221

Filed 08/04/2006

Page 1 of 1