Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 24.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 3, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 380 Words, 2,572 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7529/39-1.pdf

Download Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware ( 24.3 kB)


Preview Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00177-SLR

Document 39

Filed 02/03/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE EDDIE TAYLOR Plaintiff v. CIVIGENICS : Defendant : : : : : : NO. 04-177-SLR

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ANSWER OF DEFENDANT TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defendant Civigenics, Inc. by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby answer the Complaint filed by Plaintiff, Eddie Taylor denying each and every averment except as to those expressly admitted below. I. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is unable to admit or deny the averments

contained in this section. II. III. Defendant specifically denies the factual averments contained in this section. Defendant admit only that the Plaintiff is Eddie Taylor and Defendant is Civigenics,

Inc. Defendant denies all other factual averments in this section. IV. Defendant specifically deny any and all factual averments contained in Plaintiff's

Statement of Claims. V. Defendant denies that Plaintiff is entitled to any relief.

WHEREFORE, Defendants request that the Court dismiss the Amended Complaint, enter judgment in their favor, and assess costs and attorney fees against the Plaintiffs. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiff's claims are barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations.

Case 1:04-cv-00177-SLR

Document 39

Filed 02/03/2006

Page 2 of 2

THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrines of waiver, estoppel, and laches. FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Defendant acted at all times in good faith and for legitimate and nondiscriminatory reasons. FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Defendant's actions or inactions were not the proximate, legal, or substantial cause of any damages, injury or loss suffered by Plaintiff, the existence of which is denied. SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiff's claims are barred by the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act. WHEREFORE, Defendants request that the Court dismiss the Amended Complaint, enter judgment in their favor, and assess costs and attorney fees against the Plaintiffs. Respectfully submitted, REGER RIZZO KAVULICH & DARNALL LLP By: /s/ Louis J. Rizzo, Jr. Louis J. Rizzo, Jr., Esquire 1001 Jefferson Street, Suite 202 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302)652-3611 (Phone) (302)652-3620 (Facsimile)

Carla P. Maresca, Esquire DEASEY MAHONEY & BENDER, LTD. Suite 1300 1800 John F. Kennedy Boulevard Philadelphia, PA 19103-2978 (215) 587-9400, ext. 135 (Phone) (215) 587-9456 (Facsimile) Attorneys for Defendant, Civigenics