Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 39.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 9, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 477 Words, 2,843 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/34453/215.pdf

Download Other Notice - District Court of Arizona ( 39.2 kB)


Preview Other Notice - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6

Russell A. Kolsrud, #004578 Brad M. Thies, #021354 N ORLING, K OLSRUD, S IFFERMAN & D AVIS, P.L.C. 16427 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 210 Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 (480) 505-0015 Attorneys for Defendant ValueOptions, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Shannon Michael Clark, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 ValueOptions, Inc., 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant ValueOptions, Inc. (?ValueOptions"), through counsel, hereby submits its Notice of Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Court Order. On December 8, 2005, this Court entered an Order requiring Plaintiff to return the service packets containing Defendant ValueOptions' statutory address for Defendant Marshall and Defendant Crumbley's home address within twenty (20) days of filing the Order. [Dkt. 180]. Plaintiff failed to do so. This Court also granted Plaintiff's request for an order directing service on Defendant Marshall and Crumbley ?one last time." [Id., p. 23]. This Court specifically stated: ?[I]f service is not properly executed on either defendant within 60 days of the filing of this Order, the action will be dismissed as to each defendant not served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Fed.R.Civ.P. and Rule 2.12(b)(3)(B)(i) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court (?Local Rules")." Id. As evidenced by Notice of Service of Defendant Karen Marshall by Plaintiff, filed on March 6, 2006, Plaintiff failed to comply with both requirements of this Court's December 8, 2005 Order. [Dkt. 213]. Pursuant to the Order issued by this Court, Plaintiff's failure to return the service packets and, more importantly, Plaintiff's failure to serve NOTICE TO COURT OF PLA IN TIFF'S FA ILU RE T O COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER Case No. CIV 03-1344-PHX-EHC (MS)

Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE

Document 215

Filed 03/09/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6

Defendants Marshall and Crumbley by February 6, 2006, requires dismissal of Defendants Marshall and Crumbley.1 DATED this 9 th day of March, 2006. NORLING, KOLSRUD, SIFFERMAN & DAVIS, P.L.C.

By: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Brad M. Thies Shannon M. Clark #113372 ASPC-Tucson-Santa Rita P.O. Box 24406 Tucson, AZ 85734-4406 Plaintiff pro per The Honorable Morton Silver U.S. District Court 401 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85003-2118 Copy of the foregoing mailed this 9 th day of March, 2006, to: Original of the foregoing e-filed with the Clerk this 9 th day of March, 2006. Copy of the foregoing delivered this 10 th day of March, 2006, to:

/s/ Brad M. Thies Russell A. Kolsrud Brad M. Thies Attorneys for Defendant ValueOptions, Inc.

This Court ?will" dismiss each defendant not served pursuant to Rule 4(m). [Dkt. 180, p. 2].
1

2

Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE

Document 215

Filed 03/09/2006

Page 2 of 2