$§héF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I A FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Debra Jilka, )
) No. CV—03—l369-PHX—MHM
Plaintiff, )
I
’ ORIGINAL
I
Drivetime Automotive Group aka )
Ugly Duckling Corporation, I
I
Defendants. )
I
* DEPOSITION OF DEBRA JILKA
Phoenix, Arizona `
February ll, 2004
9:10 o'clock a.m.
Prepared by: ° U
SUSAN D. BINGHAM
Certified Court Reporter BARTELT&KENYON
Certificate #50364 CourtReporters
101 North FirstAvenue
Prepared for: Suite2450
MS. ELIZABETH PETERSEN Phoenix,Arizona85003
Attorney at Law Phone: (602) 254-4111
(Certified Copy) Fax: (602) 254-6567 -
Case 2:03-cv-01369—IVIHI\/I Document 119-2 Filed 10/12/2005 Page 2 014
O2/11/O4 DEPOSITION OF DEBRA JILKA 28
1 leaving the Duck. We were already done with that.
‘ 2 Q. So the house remodeling interfering with your
3 studies at Concord, that was prior to leaving Ugly
4 Duckling?
5 A. I did not say that.
6 Q. Explain to me what you meant when I asked you ——
7 A. You stated that the remodeling interfered with
8 my studies. The remodeling did not interfere with my
9 studies.
1O Q. I'll just let the record reflect what you've
11 already stated and we'll clarify later, if necessary.
12 So your studies were not interfered with by the
13 remodeling project, that's your testimony now? l
Q , 14 A. Correct.
15 Q. And it was the process of searching for a job
16 that precluded you from attending classes?
17a A. Correct. .
Aéq 18 Q. And there's nothing else that was preventing you
19 from continuing your studies?
2O A. Not that I recall.
21 Q. What is your date of birth?
22 A. November 1st, 1957.
23 Q. Do you currently own your home?
24 A. Yes. `
25 Q. Are you currently married?
case 2:03-cv—O1369-MI§@RTZDL0jcu§`neY1ErA1$j@V2 ( 6Qé1Ved21’50<’/T2/12005 Page 3 of 4
O2/11/O4 DEPosITIoN OF DEBRA JILKA 29
1 A. No.
2 Q. Are you divorced?
3 A. No.
4 Q. You've never been married?
5 A. Okay, I object. What does this have to do with
6 what has happened? Could you explain your line of
7 questioning?
8 Q. 1t's a standard background question. 1t's part
9 of standard interrogatories. 1t's standard questioning
1O to the court and you don't have a basis to object to it.
11 A. Okay.
12 Q. Have you ever been married?
13 A. No. U
{ j 14 Q. ls there any reason why you're upset with the
15 question about your marital status?
16 A. 1t's not the marital status that 1'm upset
17 about. . ·
18 — Q. It seemed to be a difficult question for you to
19 answer yes or no if you were married, and that's why I
20 asked the fo1low—up question if you were divorced.
21 A. 1t's not a difficult question. I just do not W
22 follow your line of reasoning and I have stated that I
23 objected to it.
24 Q. All right. Do you have any children?
25 A. Do not. _
Case 2:03-cv-O1369—MHWRT1E7)b€uP"r1e‘?{1¥PY$f@i\Q (6
Case 2:03-cv-01369-MHM
Document 119-2
Filed 10/12/2005
Page 1 of 4
Case 2:03-cv-01369-MHM
Document 119-2
Filed 10/12/2005
Page 2 of 4
Case 2:03-cv-01369-MHM
Document 119-2
Filed 10/12/2005
Page 3 of 4
Case 2:03-cv-01369-MHM
Document 119-2
Filed 10/12/2005
Page 4 of 4
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms