1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiffs filed a pleading (doc. # 119) on July 26, 2005 indicating that page eight 17 may have been inadvertently missing from Plaintiffs' original Reply To Defendant's 18 Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Summary Judgment (doc. # 117), filed on July 20, 19 2005. Page eight is, in fact, missing from the original and Court's copy. The Court treats this 20 July 26, 2005 pleading as a Notice of Errata and on the Court's own motion, 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28
Case 2:03-cv-01373-LOA Document 120 Filed 09/02/2005 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
John Roehrs, M.D. and Jean Roehrs, his) ) wife, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) Minnesota Life Insurance Company, et al.,) ) ) Defendants. ) )
No. CV-03-1373-PHX-LOA ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Reply To Defendant's Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Summary Judgment (doc. # 117) is hereby supplemented with, and is deemed to contain, page 8 filed on July 26, 2005. DATED this 1st day of September, 2005.
-2Case 2:03-cv-01373-LOA Document 120 Filed 09/02/2005 Page 2 of 2