Free Affidavit in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

...Tl;;-§;lVED jj_‘·§§§$E°
1 UNITED SNES U13‘I'RI3¤'®¤RT APR 21 2006
2 Fck THE I1I.$'|'FI¢Tl`¤F"uz°"* gvGLg?s£{rg;gP§;2l$;g§g”T
3 %
4. clove. NG C1/03 — 13**13- PH><—SRE> {
s Flqlvlfvnp
7 (°.l1¤1l*l<$ Ryan e"l“el·, Br Eilihsicn 0-F Time R I`·`”e;N6hr.e»¤1'-‘ Qp|:o..¤|
8 www
9
10 S'IA'I'E•F AEIZMJA E SS
1 1 cnunrrvnr FINAL `
1 1
1 3 LI am cumwlfy l’¤¤¤5<*-¢l ¤‘l‘,¢\r==¤v1v· $+¤‘I‘e Prism Complex-E;,»¤¤,5pe¤i¤I Mmqmaf Un?l'1I "SMUJI".
1* 2-1 was sedemecl ‘l¤ 25yr·+¤ Crlie an l‘l8Q>·
15 3.Iqm vepres@v\'l1}g myse.l·P lm "H1&·-c¤ll¤U=llYl3 ll‘l’l_¢jG·`l1£>n.
l6 4-.Iqm c¤mr:€l2n"l"l?> wwl 17 5]; am c;urrerrl*Iy dh 2+ haw; lc•c.l¢—-down s‘l·ccl·us.
*8 6·>.I<;l¤ mrl‘ lmve. qn A»D.o.c. prnbcwarjeb-
lg TI. cum mil' allwfecl ·=>¤•‘l‘¤‘l; my Ce-ll ·l¤ wvvl;.
2 ° , 8.32 Yeceiveel Oh decision on —H»¤. above case. c45cu}ns‘l' Plq¤}rl1;Pl2¤n Mqrdm 28.Z¤··=>b-
ll qfxwqs 1"wbma qelqmd-¤P#121~a.¤¤,~¤¤ IJ alle.; m¤.+.» .,1,1.2.11 my 1m¤c»splHf-Wepyeql.
2 Z |¤·I Hasn. hc>Pri5oner_]¤l>.<1ncl ccxmil {my ·ll>1' my ‘lYa*1S¤”¢}9’l3 ·
23 ll. I lme, q 30 dey clexllme, —|—¤-File my "N¤·H¤c·. ¤P Appeal". ·
2* U-I am veqqegliyg-pma. eeqsgle my ·lmnscr[[rl; 1h·l+1e above cme-Ev Appeal process.
2.5
26 IDP-clara, ·llqq-l uv\c:lav"F€mllyGl2?2F;1WY 1*m+ ’ll1e —Q>v¢3<>1vx3 `1s**[E·uc and G¤Tl`€.Cl'.
17 l>