Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:03-cv-01425-DGC Document 63-2 Filed 02/27/2006 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA CRAIG TUCKER, No. CV 03-1425 PHX DGC Plaintiff, v. JUDGMENT THE CITY OF TEMPE, Defendant.

The above-entitled and numbered cause came before the Court for a trial by jury on the 22nd day of November, 2005. The Plaintiff was represented by his attorney, Stephen Montoya, and the Defendant City of Tempe was represented by its attorneys, Marlene A. Pontrelli and Kara L. Stanek. All parties announced ready, the Plaintiff introduced

evidence in support of his Complaint and the Defendants introduced evidence in opposition thereto. The matter was submitted to the jury for its determination and the jury rendered its verdict for the Plaintiff, the Court finds Plaintiff is entitled to judgment and further finds there is no just reason for delay in entering final judgment and therefore directs entry of judgment herein. ... ... ... ...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff take $85,000 by his Complaint and the Court having found no just reason for delay, expressly directs entry of judgment upon the verdict for the Plaintiff and against the Defendant City of Tempe. DATED this day of , 2006.

Hon. David G. Campell United States District Judge

2
Case 2:03-cv-01425-DGC Document 63-2 Filed 02/27/2006 Page 2 of 2