Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 13.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 20, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 380 Words, 2,342 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/34682/64.pdf

Download Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 13.9 kB)


Preview Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PAUL K. CHARLTON United States Attorney District of Arizona RICHARD G. PATRICK Assistant U.S. Attorney Arizona State Bar No. 5148 Two Renaissance Square 40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408 Telephone: (602) 514-7500 Facsimile: (602) 514-7760 [email protected]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Charles August Schlund, III, an individual CIV-03-01590-PHX-VAM Plaintiff, v. George W. Bush, President of the United States, a Sovereign Nation, George W. Bush, an individual; Does 1-10, individuals; Does 11-20, entities, Defendants. More than 75 days after filing his notice of appeal, plaintiff has renewed a motion which the Court denied on January 5, 2006. To the extent the Court considers the current motion a motion for reconsideration, defendant cannot respond except by Court permission. LR FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO NOTICE OF RENEWAL OF MOTION TO STRIKE WORDS FROM NOVEMBER 21, 2005 ORDER AND JUDGMENT DATED NOVEMBER 22, 2005 BY PLAINTIFF

CIV 7.2(g). To the extent the motion bears on issues on appeal, the Court lacks jurisdiction to address it. Stein v. Wood, 127 F.3d 1187, 1189 (9th Cir. 1997). Otherwise, the motion should be denied. "Patience in the face of a pro se litigant's confusion over complex principles is appropriate; patience in the face of stubborn defiance is not". Dejose v. New York State Dep't of State, 1990 WL 263051 *2 (E.D. N.Y. 1998). Respectfully submitted this 20th day of March, 2006. PAUL K. CHARLTON United States Attorney District of Arizona s/Richard G. Patrick RICHARD G. PATRICK Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 2:03-cv-01590-VAM

Document 64

Filed 03/20/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 20, 2006, I electronically transmitted the attached

3 document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing, and I served the attached 4 document by mail on the following, who are not registered participants of the CM/ECF System: 5 Charles August Schlund, III 6 8520 North 54th Drive Glendale, AZ 85302 7 s/Evelyn Bender 8 ______________________________ U.S. Attorney's Office 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Case 2:03-cv-01590-VAM

Document 64

Filed 03/20/2006

Page 2 of 2