Free Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

[ " |=u.Eo
A UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR I 5 mu?
CATHY A. CATTERSUN, CLERK
MARK E. HAMPTON, No. 06-17388
j Plaintiff- Appellant, A D.C. No. CV-03-01706-NVW ‘
` _ - District of Arizona,
v. Phoenix
W- www "C_HwARLJ ` iE'S`RYA_N;C et al}, *9 if- l l U W if M Cu M RW - 9 i`i+hMW_r_vi—H_—-
ORDER
Defendants. — Appellees. p
Before: CANBY and FISHER, Circuit Judges. l
Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied because this appeal
A does not present "exceptional circumstances" warranting the appointment of .
cotmsel. See 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(e)(l); Mlborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328 (9th l
Cir. 1986). No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this
denial shall be filed or entertained. A
A if li- F lu Rehn.- Appellantlsimotioiviiiowpiioceed -wu-in C A
because the district court found that this appeal is taken in good faith. Pursuant to
A 28 U.S.C. § l915(b)(l) and (2), however, appellant eventually must pay the iiill
amount of` the filing and docketing fees for this appeal.
S:\MOA'I`T\Panelord\3.12.C7\ordc1·s\at2\06-17388.vsrpd _ I
Case 2:O3—cv—O1706—NVW Document 92 Filed O3/21/2007 Page 1 of 2

l t
U 06-17388 . l
Accordingly, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant
C shall complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which I
. directs the prison officials at appellant’s institution to assess, collect, and forward
to the court the $455.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly _
- C basis whenever funds eirist in appellant’s trust fund account. These fees will _
”i”””i e .e...r;.r;g;;;gr.;rgr§.ir;rt;; }ErQaQZ.5QY..{;n§5lY§S}s0¤ ofthis
appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(b)(2), (e)(2).
lf appellant fails to comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this _
appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-l .‘ b
l If appellant complies with this order, the opening brief will bedue May 15, U ·
i 2007; the answering brief will be due June 14, 2007; and the optional reply brief e
will be due within l4_days after service ofthe answering brief
Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, the court waives the
, See9tlrCi·r:1§ 30-r1:2?"Apmllees.?‘suppTeinental‘ “7 ‘ ""“""*
excerpts of record are limited to the district court docket sheet, the notice of
i `order appealed from, and any specific portions of the
record See 9th Cir. 30-1.7. l
f Sg§;¢}r§3.l~s;»”...r..ra3.;;Qa§i£;l;;;&;t;x0r.r738S...,d 2
A Case 2:O3—cv-O1706—NVW Document 92 Filed O3/21/2007 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01706-NVW

Document 92

Filed 03/21/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01706-NVW

Document 92

Filed 03/21/2007

Page 2 of 2