Free Order on Motion to Withdraw - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. 192.019 Acres of Land, more or less, located in Yuma County, State of Arizona; Glen G. Curtis, Trustee of Curtis Family Trust; Sam Perricone, Trustee of Amended and Restated Declaration of Revocable Trust of Sam Perricone and Mary Louise Perricone; Earl O. Zion and Esther E. Zion; Yuma County Tax Assessor, Yuma Hospital District No. 1; Yuma County Citrus Pest Control District; Yuma County Pest Abatement District; Yuma County Flood Control District; Farm Credit Services Southwest; Intangible property rights, Yuma Mesa Irrigation and Drainage District; and Unknown Owners, Defendants. Defendants, Glen G. Curtis, Trustee of the Curtis Family Trust Dated July 25, 1986 and Sam Perricone, Trustee of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Revocable Trust of Sam Perricone and Mary Louise Perricone Dated May 22, 1992, filed their Motion for Withdrawal of Remainder of Deposit. Defendants Curtis and Perricone request withdrawal of the balance on deposit because there are no known competing claims to the estimated just compensation remaining on deposit with the Court. The Court has considered the Motion, and good cause appearing, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion for Withdrawal of Remainder of Deposit by Defendants Curtis/Perricone. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ORDER Case No. CV 03 2006 PHX SRB

Case 2:03-cv-02006-SRB

Document 108

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk immediately distribute to Glen G. Curtis, Trustee of the Curtis Family Trust, and Sam Perricone, Trustee of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Revocable Trust of Sam Perricone and Mary Perricone, the sum of $179,439.55 on deposit with the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Curtis and Perricone having warranted their right, title and interest in the property must remit any portion of the deposit distributed by this Order that is later shown to belong to any other claimant together with interest thereon at the rate established by the Declaration of Taking Act.

DATED this 6th day of October, 2005.

Case 2:03-cv-02006-SRB

Document 108

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 2 of 2